mas0764
Registered User
- Jul 16, 2005
- 13,910
- 11,328
Posted on the other thread that an unvetted source I just started following said that Nashville is pursuing Nash aggressively. Encouraging for me.
They can have him for Eeli Tolvanen.
Posted on the other thread that an unvetted source I just started following said that Nashville is pursuing Nash aggressively. Encouraging for me.
I for one like his effort and yeah t seems like he cares but.......I root for the sweater not the person. Good riddance and bring me back someone who can produce points. If he loves it here so much, go to Winnipeg play a couple of months, then come back and resign in the offseason to be our third line winger for 3.5 millionWhen are we going to stop looking at players as simply computerized automatons and not human beings?
We all complain when players don't show the same loyalty to our teams as we do. When one does, how can we complain?
I've made this point over and over: players are no different than you or I. Yes, they are supremely gifted athletically (the same way some of us might be gifted in other ways), but they are subject to the same emotions as we are. Each reacts according to his personality. In the end, money makes no difference.
Yes, his is a glamorous life that we all fantasize about: money, youth (he might be old in terms of hockey but not in terms of real life), acclaim, etc. But many are, just as we are, focused on their families. Many are not out chasing attractive women. The Rangers seem to have the share of family-oriented players. Many have young children. Those of us who have been parents (and in my case, a grandfather also), know the pull of family.
I don't know about you but when I heard Nash talk about how his 3-year old son sings the Ranger goal song whenever we score, I was touched to the core. As a fan, how can you not love that?
Yes, Nash is rich (at least compared to almost all, if not really all, of us). Yes, he is a player in decline. But he also seems very much a blue-collar worker who gives his all, cares about his team and teammates, and loves NYC.
Those traits should be applauded and not abased. Money doesn't define everything.
Nash was baring his soul to us. How often do we moan and groan when players give interviews and answer questions with stock answers that make us shake our heads? Nash is a special person. Yes, his last years with us have been disappointing, but I have nothing but admiration for the guy. That admiration comes not only for how he has handled his declining skills while still contributing, from his work ethic and blue-collar attitude, from his leadership and mentoring young players, but also from his allowing us to see his inner self.
We all love the Rangers and take pride in being fans. How can we castigate a player for being proud to play for our team and not want to leave?
Patrick Kane ring a bell. ExoneratedAlleged sexual assault, making him a predator of the worst kind.
This is a really stupid post. He's not starting a GoFundMe and begging for your sympathy. He's having a human reaction to a significant change in his life, and you're taking issue with that?I really feel bad for Nash. What do I tell my son? Tell him we are filthy rich so stop whining about the Rangers. Just stop please.
This is all true but beside the point. The point is he said his son will be disappointed and someone, for some bizarre reason, felt that was something that needed to be criticized.He can tell his son that he doesn't have to like the team that his dad plays for the best. Certainly happens in sports. If his son wants to keep rooting for the Rangers, then let him. Or if Nash really cares about it that much, then resign with the Rangers on the cheap next season.
This is a really stupid post. He's not starting a GoFundMe and begging for your sympathy. He's having a human reaction to a significant change in his life, and you're taking issue with that?
I stand by stupid. And yes, if people made comments suggesting that Girardi wasn't entitled to feel emotions because he gets paid a lot of money, it was stupid then too.Actually not stupid so much as insensitive and not all that dissimilar to what's been said about other players when they were moved or left--such as Girardi who must have blocked 10,000 shots for us and that worked well with Tortorella's system (remember that?--Torts wanted everybody blocking shots) but not so much for AV's. RB's remark is something that pretty much 95% of the posters on this board have said about some or multiple players before.
I stand by stupid. And yes, if people made comments suggesting that Girardi wasn't entitled to feel emotions because he gets paid a lot of money, it was stupid then too.
Did he cry while saying it too?Dreger basically said what i said, he wouldnt he suprised if Nash loaded up teams he would accept a trade to with teams that wouldnt even be able to afford him.
0/10.Did he cry while saying it too?
No. I don't recognize your authority to judge me.0/10.
Try again, you’re losing it
Dreger basically said what i said, he wouldnt he suprised if Nash loaded up teams he would accept a trade to with teams that wouldnt even be able to afford him.
Randy Levine doesn't work for the Rangers. No one is going to be pissed off if he uses the leverage available to him.Nash himself said that he wants to go to a team with a chance to win.
If he wants to be here beyond this season, he isn't going to piss off his employer by doing that. Hes smarter than that.
No. I don't recognize your authority to judge me.
Losing it? It says you joined in June of last year. I haven't posted much in that time. What was your previous handle?
When are we going to stop looking at players as simply computerized automatons and not human beings?
We all complain when players don't show the same loyalty to our teams as we do. When one does, how can we complain?
I've made this point over and over: players are no different than you or I. Yes, they are supremely gifted athletically (the same way some of us might be gifted in other ways), but they are subject to the same emotions as we are. Each reacts according to his personality. In the end, money makes no difference.
Yes, his is a glamorous life that we all fantasize about: money, youth (he might be old in terms of hockey but not in terms of real life), acclaim, etc. But many are, just as we are, focused on their families. Many are not out chasing attractive women. The Rangers seem to have the share of family-oriented players. Many have young children. Those of us who have been parents (and in my case, a grandfather also), know the pull of family.
I don't know about you but when I heard Nash talk about how his 3-year old son sings the Ranger goal song whenever we score, I was touched to the core. As a fan, how can you not love that?
Yes, Nash is rich (at least compared to almost all, if not really all, of us). Yes, he is a player in decline. But he also seems very much a blue-collar worker who gives his all, cares about his team and teammates, and loves NYC.
Those traits should be applauded and not abased. Money doesn't define everything.
Nash was baring his soul to us. How often do we moan and groan when players give interviews and answer questions with stock answers that make us shake our heads? Nash is a special person. Yes, his last years with us have been disappointing, but I have nothing but admiration for the guy. That admiration comes not only for how he has handled his declining skills while still contributing, from his work ethic and blue-collar attitude, from his leadership and mentoring young players, but also from his allowing us to see his inner self.
We all love the Rangers and take pride in being fans. How can we castigate a player for being proud to play for our team and not want to leave?
Bob McKenzie, on TSN 1040, said that he expects that the Rangers will want a return for Rick Nash that is at least comparable to what Minnesota gave up to acquire Martin Hanzal last year.
McKenzie said that the Rangers are going to want to make sure that they get "at least a first round pick, maybe a second round pick or a prospect on top of that. Maybe even a third element, another pick or lower end player. They will be looking for at least what Arizona got for Martin Hanzal." (TSN 1040)
Hanzal, along with Ryan White and a 2017 4th round pick, was traded from Arizona to Minnesota last year for a package including a 2017 first round pick, 2018 second round pick, a 2019 conditional 4th rounder and minor leaguer Grayson Downing.
McKenzie notes that the following teams, Winnipeg, St. Louis, Anaheim, Boston, Calgary, LA and San Jose are all reportedly looking for a scoring winger.
Nash has submitted a list of at least 12 teams that he would accept a trade to.
Darren Dreger noted on TSN 1050 this morning that Nash's list could have been done strategically to include teams up against the cap that might not actually be able to acquire him or non-playoff teams.
Dreger said that because of that, Nash's actual list may only be 5 or 6 teams. (TSN 1050)
Pierre LeBrun noted on Monday that he thinks the Rangers will eat some money to facilitate a trade of Nash. (TSN 1290)
alkurtz is a treasure. He doesn't post often, but when he does, it's f***ing great. He is a wise man for sure.Having just taken the plunge and signed up, although, having been literally reading these boards for years prior, that's one of the best posts I've read.