Come on man there is no denying that we would be a better team today with Radulov.
We wouldn't be better by any meaningful way...his addition doesn't make us contenders.
No, we're still a team that's going to get bounced in the 1st round vs a team that's deeper down the middle than we are.
Why can't we agree that Bergevin didn't improve the team as much as he could have? He absolutely had the inside track to sign Radu and chose to gamble on him.
We went from having a strength on wing to being average.
He didn't choose to gamble on Radulov, he offered him the same contract he ended up signing in Dallas. It's more Radulov wanted more money to stay, his loyalty to the Habs, wasn't as important as his loyalty to money, which is fine, it's his right.
I'd go after the money too..
As far as our strength on the wing, its as strong, perhaps even stronger IMO. But we're still incredibly weak down the middle.
He may not have been able to address our center depth due to lack of real options but there would have been nothing wrong with having the following wingers :
Drouin
Radulov
Pacioretty
Gallagher
Lekhonen
Byron
I would at this point say that mission accomplished he made the team as good as possible for 2017-2018.
However now there are so many question marks and "if" scenarios that I don't have much faith in our ability to compete
You raise those wingers...i'll raise you the following centers
Danault
Plekanec
Mitchell
McCarron
As long as this group continues to be this poor, it doesn't matter who we have on the wing, Radulov or no Radulov.
We have enough quality wingers even without Radulov, what we don't have is any top 6C's. The focus needs to be on that.