I missed the part when after a benching and a few games of a few shifts on the "4th line" (when Eller notable did NOT replace him ice-time wise) DD roared back while playing on the 3rd line with checking forwards (I'll call them that for flattery).
DD did make a comeback, and I for one think he's playing well. That said, DD didn't have to do much to be put right back into a position where he could easily redeem himself. What did Desharnais do, apart from the SO to deserve the mins he got RIGHT AWAY? Eller will need to be a ppg player for over 20 games before they even think of promoting him and even then it's contingent upon DD struggling.
For sure, Eller needs to be better. I don't, however thing the situation is analagous to DD's who had 1st line centre waiting for him for the first game when he didn't play like crap. HUGE difference. FWIW, I'm totally fine with the EGG line being reunited and played as a "3rd line". We'll see how amazing the other two are (DD and Patches). Pacioretty for one is starting to look slumpy again.
He gets the raw end of the stick (Eller) and it won't change until his line, whatever that is, gets more minutes a game, even if they don't produce immediately. THAT is what happened to DD, and tbf, it did work.
Think whatever you want. hate DD as much as you want. Let,s concentrate on Eller for a minute, though. Whatever you think of him, by claiming he needs to play with superior line mates, we are just stipulating ONE fact:
Eller doesn't appear capable of making his line mates better. That makes him a complementary player, not one which you build around. There,s nothing wrong with that -- every team needs complementary players -- but, let's not look for more out of Eller than he appears able to bring to the table.
Bottom line, Eller will benefit from playing with Gallagher for example, not the other way around…
Without getting into a heavy comparison, IMO, wingers would, however, benefit from Desharnais' playmaking skills. Eller, IMO, doesn't have those skills honed. Not yet, at least, as he seems a fraction of a second behind on most plays.
I also think playing Eller with Galchenyuk is a disservice to Galchenyuk as Eller doesn't seem to be in any kind of symbiosis with Galchenyuk, for whatever reason.
When the EGG line was producing, Eller was playing as a duo with Gallagher and Galchenyuk was just creating room by beelining for the net. Eller still wasn't using Galchenyuk properly. Once Gallagher left that line, Eller and Galchenyuk, together, just didn't work at all.
If you're going to shake things up, why not try something weird:
Pacioretty-DD-Galchenyuk
Brière-Plekanec-Gionta
Prust/Weise-Eller-Gallagher
Prust/weise-white-Moen/Bournival
Eller will benefit rom Gallagher on his line. Prust or Weise can create room in the offensive zone.
Brière-Plekanec-Gionta would be a veteran line in a primarily shutdown role with more offensive upside with Brière and, in certain situations, more defensive upside while switching out Brière for Moen or, even, Bournival (Defensive zone F/Os, for example)
If Galchenyuk plays less of a perimeter game, he would be fine alongside Desharnais and Pacioretty, provided Desharnais keeps getting his nose dirty as he had during his best shifts. FGalchenyuk can also find pacioretty for one-timers and, if he uses his shot more often, can be a good target for DD.