And what does Mrazek accomplish if we keep him? He keeps being what he is for another year or two at most and then we lose him for absolutely nothing, or we at least get something for him now, while he has a little value. I honestly don't see some astonishing difference in his play after this trade.
Do you watch Red Wings games? Or do you check the stats.
Did you see the game last night?
Goal 1. Jensen has it. Chips it to a maple leaf. Doesn't cover JVR, who deflects the shot past Mrazek - who has virtually no chance unless the deflection just hits him.
Goal 2. Kronwall passes it from behind the net to AA... but the pass is behind him and AA can't handle it. Puck goes back to Kadri who feeds the Marner in the slot for a point blank chance.
Again, Mrazek has to hope it hits him on a bang-bang play.
Goal 3. Faceoff goes to Jensen on the boards. Jensen pushed off the puck. Nylander gets there before Larkin. Nylander takes to the puck to the goal mouth before AA knocks it loose. But it goes to Matthews at the side of the net and he's not being covered, whatsoever, by Dekeyser, who didn't think it was important to cover the guy.
I get that a lot of goals are breakdowns of some sort But virtually every goal comes from horrible plays by this team's defense.
It's been a long, long time since I saw as many backdoor goals on the Red Wings as I've seen this year. Probably 88 or so.
The point is, bad defenses in bad systems are going to give up higher quality scoring chances and more goals.
If you want to look at GAA and save percentages and say "the goalies suck," fine.
But I think one of the reasons why goalie stats are volatile is because they're so reliant upon the coach's system and the personnel to carry it out.