Hattrick Kane
Registered User
- Oct 8, 2018
- 9,019
- 13,136
We wouldn't get any real assets trading him anyway.Fine. Was thinking he would be heading to LA at the deadline. Dont think we have many other options to send out now.
maybeWe wouldn't get any real assets trading him anyway.
Fleury was playing like one of the best goalies in the league at that time with a high reputation. Mrazek isn't close to that.maybe
they got a 2nd for Fleury that turned into Ryan Greene. Id say hes an asset.
Fleury was playing like one of the best goalies in the league at that time with a high reputation. Mrazek isn't close to that.
45 | 19 | 21 | -- | 5 | 1398 | 2.95 | .908 |
30 | 12 | 17 | 0 | 1 | 970 | 3.01 | .907 |
I don't see it. Mrazek is known to be inconsistent and Fleury has three rings and was the reigning Vezina winner. Reputation is a very big thing to some of these GM's. But maybe you're right, there's no help in net to be had.Fleury
45 19 21 -- 5 1398 2.95 .908
Mrazek
30 12 17 0 1 970 3.01 .907
The only difference is the reputation. The trade was for a conditional pick that turned into 2nd because the wild didnt make the conference finals. Playoff teams this year need goaltending more then ever. I think we could have gotten a 2nd.
Whether getting a 2nd or having a solid goalie in place for the next 2.5 years is more important I dunno. But he would have gotten an asset.
You dont see what? Getting a 2nd?I don't see it. Mrazek is known to be inconsistent and Fleury has three rings and was the reigning Vezina winner. Reputation is a very big thing to some of these GM's. But maybe you're right, there's no help in net to be had.
I said "at the time". Fleury had a miserable start to the season that year which affected his numbers greatly. And reputation is huge when it comes to goaltending. Fleury has it, Mrazek doesn't. Maybe we get a 3rd, thats not a real asset.Fleury
45 19 21 -- 5 1398 2.95 .908
Mrazek
30 12 17 0 1 970 3.01 .907
The only difference is the reputation. The trade was for a conditional pick that turned into 2nd because the wild didnt make the conference finals. Playoff teams this year need goaltending more then ever. I think we could have gotten a 2nd.
Whether getting a 2nd or having a solid goalie in place for the next 2.5 years is more important I dunno. But he would have gotten an asset.
You really do miss Bowman.4 Mill for this garbage goalie cool, the Stan era continues, this team isn’t winning a cup anytime soon, maybe in 10 years what do you guys think? He’s literally pissing 2 year away with all these garbage inflated signings…
Imagine thinking we are doing anything in the next 2 years anyway. lol4 Mill for this garbage goalie cool, the Stan era continues, this team isn’t winning a cup anytime soon, maybe in 10 years what do you guys think? He’s literally pissing 2 year away with all these garbage inflated signings…
Thats completely fair.Beyond the fact that I think the teams looking for goaltending have already tried the Mrazek experience, I don't think the Blackhawks should be trading Mrazek for the sake of the Blackhawks. They can't roll Soda until the end of the year and Commesso needs to be in the AHL and Stauber isn't good.
No long term money, he's been a little lucky I think this year but also been really good at the same time. Happy with the deal and perfectly fine to roll him, crazy we got paid to take him.
you saying "at the time" can cherry pick any stat you want. I picked the full time in Chicago. If you were to pick the last month leading up to the trade fleury stats would have been worse than his full year average. He was playing good just like Mrazek is now.I said "at the time". Fleury had a miserable start to the season that year which affected his numbers greatly. And reputation is huge when it comes to goaltending. Fleury has it, Mrazek doesn't. Maybe we get a 3rd, thats not a real asset.