Dominance
99-66-4-9-87/97
Gotta love the numerous 2019-drafted players being mentioned after the OP specifically stated it was too early one way or the other.
Mediocre play might point to you underrating him more then anything. Have you actually watch him play, because I haven't seen that from him in either NCAA, training camps, WJC. In fact, everytime I saw him play you can see he has a game that would easily transfer to the nhl, however his offense wasn't alway at the rendez-vous. But, that was mostly in the NCAA were he didn't have the best offensive wingers by his side and had more defensive responsabilities playing agaisnt the other teams top lines. Time will tell I guess. Most label him as a middle 6 center, I think that's a very safe projection.Five players come to mind.
Quinn Hughes: A complete rover of a defensemen. He’ll be one of the best skaters, stickhandlers and playmakers in the NHL, but he wouldn’t know where the defensive zone is if you put up a sign for it. I also don’t like his hockey IQ at either end of the ice. He’ll put up a lot of points, but will give plenty back, and be a low end NHL’er.
Hayton: Another player whose hockey IQ I don’t like. It’s not that bad, but it’s a lot worse than the reputation it gets, in my opinion. He’s above-average across the board, but I don’t see the talent in any part of the game to be more than a 2C.
Samorukov: Classic case of an older CHL’er dominating in his last year in the league. I’ve always thought he’d play in the NHL, but I don’t buy that he has high upside. I don’t like his puck skill or vision.
Poehling: Another who will play in the NHL as an average player, but low-end upside. Small sample sizes don’t prove high upside over mediocre play in high sample sizes. I even think he’s getting the benefit of the doubt for his NCAA play in a way that others don’t get.
Zadina: Everyone overrated this guy to some extent. He’ll be a top six guy, maybe a top line guy, but I think he lacks the high-high end upside. Mediocre skating, size isn’t the advantage most thought it might be, not a line driver.
As a Sens fan, I think Brannstrom and Thomson are overrated, mostly due to issues with decision-making.
Both have the skill and speed to be difference makers, but Brannstrom's hockey IQ leaves a lot to be desired, and Thomson is dumb as a rock.
Brännström has always been a bit overrated, never been particularly high on him. Will likely have a solid NHL career though.
I will based this on guys I've actually watched since their draft year and keep it strictly to the OHL for now
Merkley (maybe less so the closer we got to the draft). Just more style then substance....he doesn't really play engaged hockey 5 on 5 and I think that's a massive problem at the next level (he's not nearly good enough to get away with it either)
Bouchard- I'm not sold on his 4 way mobility and I really think he's just a PP specialist with a good shot. I also don't think he really got better last year (and that's keeping in mind the shift in defensive responsibility) and actually played worst.
Nick Suzuki- this is a odd one, just never been a fan of his. This is one of the odd cases I'll go against the analytics which make strong cases for him for NHL success. To keep things short, he reminds me of Alex Nylander except with worst skating
I'm sorry but you haven't seen Suzuki much lately if you think he has skating problems.Nick Suzuki- this is a odd one, just never been a fan of his. This is one of the odd cases I'll go against the analytics which make strong cases for him for NHL success. To keep things short, he reminds me of Alex Nylander except with worst skating
this comment makes me think you only read the scoresheet with him and didnt read how his summer training went nor watch a minute of play?Veleno. Just because he scored a lot of points doesn’t mean he has the offensive tools to become a 1st line player in the NHL.
He almost made the Isles this preseason. Very impressive showing. Should be a full time NHLer in 2020-21Mittelstatd. The hype he got was so unrealistic, he was listed as a top 3 prospect in many lists. I watched a lot of him and I just never saw it and I still don't. I read lots that boasted him as a top line centre potentially but I was always like nah 2nd line ceiling.
Wahlstrom. I don't see him having the ability to translate his game to the next level. I know he did better in the AHL but his college showings have me very hesitant on him.
I agree he looked great in his stint at the end of last season, but I thought he looked sluggish & bad in the preseason. Looks almost like he's injured or sick.Surprised Quinn Hughes has been getting votes here. He stepped into the NHL as a teenager and was an automatic breakout machine from his own zone at the end of last season. Posted just ridiculously good stats in this regard in his 5 games. Has picked up where he left off in the pre-season.
Plays with a ton of conviction and confidence while defending too. Size will always be a weakness, but hockey IQ, skill and skating are just too good to hold him back.
Not sure if he's a Calder finalist, but wouldn't bet against him.
Was just his last game where he didn’t play his best IMO. His partner Biega had an off night, as well as the forwards.I agree he looked great in his stint at the end of last season, but I thought he looked sluggish & bad in the preseason. Looks almost like he's injured or sick.
- casey mittelstadt
- Riley Tufte
- Tage Thompson
He needed to stay another year in college.I agree to an extent on both. I think Casey has a lot of talent but playing center in the NHL at such a young age is so tough. He might have more upside on the wing, but maybe in a few years if he sticks with it he will be a big time center. Wahlstrom just leaves me wanting so often, I don't have any question about his ability to do well in the NHL I just don't know if he actually will. He's a headscratcher, probably one of the most gifted prospects I've followed who has yet to realize his massive potential
What the heck are you talking about: Tage is one of the very few wingers in the sport capable of carrying a lion all by himself.