But doesn't this work both ways? Canucks fans were saying it was all about results now it's about analytics?
Depends on who you’re talking to. Most of the fans who weren’t dismissing PDO were suggesting that it was clear based on watching the team that the PDO was affecting their underlying numbers due to score effects, particularly with some of the early season blowouts, and that as the PDO normalized, those underlying numbers would also normalize, because while things like expected goals tend to be better indicators of sustainable performance than goals alone, they’re also subjected to variance over small sample. And that’s exactly what has happened. The team has been top 10 in a lot of statistics related to possession and chance generation since the start of November and have been slowly improving on those numbers. But as soon as the team slumped after the All Star break the same people who hadn’t checked an expected goal for stat since October came out of the woodwork to pat themselves on the back despite being wrong
Now, they’re not some powerhouse and have their share of flaws (they can go in scoring slumps, can struggle against particularly fast or big teams, have periods where they break down defensively and I worry about their experience and mental toughness if they face adversity). They could very well find themselves eliminated the first round with league parity as it is. But they’re a good team, and it shouldn’t shock anyone paying attention if they have a strong playoffs