You're doing a lot of goal post moving here.
The city manager and the mayor deserve a lot of credit for the positive developments in Worcester the Charlie baker administration has helped to.You said that if Manchester had a competent owner than the situation Manchester was facing wouldn't have looked so ridiculous. I responded with that not every market gets a great owner who is fully invested and there's other factors that drive success. And whether you accept it or not, the factors have statistically shown that the renovations bring people into Worcester and are always credited with helping make the town more of a place to go out and do things, one of those things being the Railers. Not every great owner builds a brand new practice facility within walking distance of the arena. Not every great owner has half the city rebuilding and remodeling itself and bringing in a lot of people and increasingly more money. Not every great owner has their administration and players constantly reaching out and connecting with the community.
It's not moving the goalposts. Great, committed ownership isn't the be-all end-all for minor league hockey. Nailers might have the best ownership in the ECHL, having kept them alive long after the team should've folded, as well as keeping rec rinks and alive in the Ohio Valley. And we all know they haven't been a success story.
The city manager and the mayor deserve a lot of credit for the positive developments in Worcester the Charlie baker administration has helped to.
You said that if Manchester had a competent owner than the situation Manchester was facing wouldn't have looked so ridiculous. I responded with that not every market gets a great owner who is fully invested and there's other factors that drive success. And whether you accept it or not, the factors have statistically shown that the renovations bring people into Worcester and are always credited with helping make the town more of a place to go out and do things, one of those things being the Railers. Not every great owner builds a brand new practice facility within walking distance of the arena. Not every great owner has half the city rebuilding and remodeling itself and bringing in a lot of people and increasingly more money. Not every great owner has their administration and players constantly reaching out and connecting with the community.
It's not moving the goalposts. Great, committed ownership isn't the be-all end-all for minor league hockey. Nailers might have the best ownership in the ECHL, having kept them alive long after the team should've folded, as well as keeping rec rinks and alive in the Ohio Valley. And we all know they haven't been a success story.
And now the attempt to move the goal posts back.
You're comparing apples and oranges here. What's happening in Worcester is completely immaterial to Manchester needing a competent local owner. If Worcester wasn't in the ECHL at all Manchester would still need, at a minimum, an invested ownership group with a legitimate plan to make the ECHL work in the city. The hockey market in Manchester is damaged badly, and it doesn't matter what's going on in the area around the arena until that damaged is fixed. I believe a local owner would be a big step in that direction.
Worcester had a advantage of having multiple affiliations and teams . People in Manchester grew attached to the AHL kingsManchester hasn't had off-ice success since their move down to the EC. That doesn't mean what's happening in Worcester is completely immaterial to Manchester needing competent ownership, regardless of where it comes from. It doesn't matter what league Worcester is in, there's things going on in Worcester, which I think we've collectively termed "other factors," that make Worcester better than Manchester that are outside of competent ownership. The goalposts haven't been moved this entire time. I've pointed out other markets that have competent ownership and they still haven't had success. It takes a lot more than a smart guy with cash and good business and hockey sense to turn a team around. Manchester clearly feels that they're above ECHL hockey. Flex tape can't fix that, competent ownership probably won't either. There's plenty of other things that go into a hockey market other the guy signing the checks for the team.
Worcester had a advantage of having multiple affiliations and teams . People in Manchester grew attached to the AHL kings
I never thought the sharks would be at the dcu indefinitely I always knew they could pull the team anytime. New England ahl fans outside of providence should have know the league did not have long term future in New England.Worcester Sharks were in Worcester 4-5 years less than the Monarchs were in Manchester. I disagree in I see the fanbase thinking they're far above the ECHL rather than growing attached to the AHL Kings.
The problem is that I assume since jerseys were in production they would be iced as the Monarchs again next season. While I'm sure the announcement is a shock to a lot of people, and related organizations in the league or producing jerseys. This market desperately needs a reset, trotting them out as the Monarchs on a last second save wouldn't be much to save the franchise. It's better for everyone to take a year maybe two off until everyone cools down. Reading the posted articles of journalists and fans saying "we are an AHL city, AHL this, AHL that" it's clear these fans aren't going to support anything less in mass unless they are hit with that ECHL or no hockey option. Once fans feel the effects of being without it, and someone brings a local identity back to the team far away from anything Kings related I think the fans will come back.
Cheek mentioning how the la Kings agreed with him killed any chance the fan base will embrace a kings farm team.
Per a press release via Twitter the ECHL Board of Governors essentially threw the Monarchs out of the league.
Manchester Membership Terminated
The bruins should be involved with a affiliation and marketing and promotions with Manchester like the leafs where Newfoundland.I’m not sure if this changes anything specifically... The ECHL really covets Manchester has a marketplace. It’s location to Boston is ideal for marketing purposes with corporation and they really of course it proximity to Worcester and Portland. I suspect terminating the franchise is part of the plan to help facilitate any new owner coming into the league... I don’t have any answer for that question. As I mentioned in the original post, we’re looking at about three to four weeks to get a new owner. They are sort of looking at Newfoundland as the model for re-engaging the fanbase on quick notice.
I don’t know.... I suspect they find an owner and start up in 2020-21 so they have a year to market the new franchise and attempt to smooth over any hurt feelings.
I suspect they find an owner and start up in 2020-21 so they have a year to market the new franchise and attempt to smooth over any hurt feelings.
If they already had one then Monarchs must of had a crap-ton of debt that the new owner didn't want to pickup (i.e. larger than an expansion fee would be).
Not as a owner a local supporter of a ownership group most likelycalling it the bruins are looking at snhu arena
Congratulations on calling the most logical possibility, at least in terms of an affiliate.calling it the bruins are looking at snhu arena
calling it the bruins are looking at snhu arena
Word on the streets is there are two parties interested, and both had no interest at all in trying to keep the Monarchs afloat.
calling it the bruins are looking at snhu arena
Owning a echl team makes no sense for a nhl owner the Jacobs Family does not even own the p-bruins.I wonder if the Bruins were to look at potentially owning an ECHL franchise, if they didn't also look at taking over the vendor services contract at the arena.
I wonder if the Bruins were to look at potentially owning an ECHL franchise, if they didn't also look at taking over the vendor services contract at the arena.