LA just waived theirs. Ik they have NMCs but Lucic doesn't have to be a regular.
This team just brings it on themselves. I agree though, I don't see a playoff team here.
No, no they don't. Sullivan in Pittsburgh is testament to modern coaches actually valuing wins over the dinosaur era apocryphal shit that comes from Sutter. When their franchise cup winning goalie struggled, he went to the rookie. The next year when the cup winning rookie struggled, he went back to the other guy. Because wins don't only count when the arbitrarily labeled quote unquote starter gets them. Which is something the dinosaur Sutter seems to forever never get.
It's the Calgary Flames. Not the Calgary Markstroms. Not the Calgary Lucics. And definitely not the Calgary Sutters.
You know what's a good way to get our top 6 going? By changing nothing and being content. 3 PPG prospects in the AHL would sure be hungry to challenge for those top 6 minutes.That's because they were just involved in a game where they gave up 9 goals and scored 8. You do nothing after that and you're asking to be fired.
We gave up 2 and scored 1. We scored 1 f***ing goal! Against the Habs, a team TRYING TO BE BAD!!!!!!! A team that was outscored 10-0 their last two games. Sit Lucic sit whoever but until this team's top 6 forwards start acting like it it won't make a difference.
He started Vladar 3 of the last 4 lol
We're in the beginning of December not the middle of April. He started his struggling goalie against a gimme team, one of the first gimme teams the Flames have faced this season. The Flames proceeded to score 1 goal on 45 shots. Blame the goalie and the coach for that if you want but that is not good enough in today's NHL. The forwards need to execute and if they can't they need to be replaced with forwards that can.
You know what's a good way to get our top 6 going? By changing nothing and being content. 3 PPG prospects in the AHL would sure be hungry to challenge for those top 6 minutes.
This organization is just a pile of excuses from the top down. You say Vladar has started 3 out of 4, well Markstrom has started 17 out of 23 despite his awful play.
He started Vladar 3 of the last 4 lol
We're in the beginning of December not the middle of April. He started his struggling goalie against a gimme team, one of the first gimme teams the Flames have faced this season. The Flames proceeded to score 1 goal on 45 shots. Blame the goalie and the coach for that if you want but that is not good enough in today's NHL. The forwards need to execute and if they can't they need to be replaced with forwards that can.
This is arbitrary nonsense. Nobody benches player because of one bad game. Shouldn't at least. Obviously Petersen has sucked for a full calendar year now and that's why he got waived... even though it's the first year of his extension.That's because they were just involved in a game where they gave up 9 goals and scored 8. You do nothing after that and you're asking to be fired.
Execution has been an issue with Sutter led teams his entire coaching career. It’s not a coincidence, it’s a pattern and a reflection of his system. Last year was the anomaly due to having three elite players dominating together on a nightly basis. The rest of the team struggled to score, much like it is this year.
Look at Iginla’s numbers prior to and after Sutter. He turned arguably the best offensive forward in the world into a 70 point player and it’s happening again with our top guys this year.
This is arbitrary nonsense. Nobody benches player because of one bad game.
Guy is struggling mentally, give him some games off and let him get his shit straight, Vladar is playing solid and can get us wins while makrstrom works out whatever is going on
Sorry but the bolded are not serious responses. I expect better from you as a poster tbh.I mean I've been one of the biggest proponents of calling these guys up since training camp. I'm sure I'm one of the few here that actually watches Wranglers games. The roster is clearly lacking talent and speed that the youth can bring.
Markstrom was a Vezina candidate last year. Every single coach in the NHL gives that guy the lions share of the starts in the beginning of the season, regardless of performance. You really are brand new if you think otherwise.
I don't believe Darryl is infallible. Plenty of head scratching decisions to be critical about. But if you think showing him the door so Treliving can bring in the next Glen Gulutzan or Geoff f***ing Ward is going to magically fix this team, well naivety has truly gotten the best of you.
Iginla won the Rocket the first year under Darryl. We also went to the Stanley Cup finals for the first time since 89 and only 3rd time ever. Gaudreau, Lindholm, and Tkachuk all set career highs last season in their first full year under Darryl. The rest of the team struggled to score because they're not good at it, much like they are this year.
i meant for a player the team signed to high AAV, and for an extended period of time.??
uhh yes they absolutely do. And have been doing so as long as the sport has existed.
To be fair, anyone (including tre) who expected Kadri to be worth 7 x 7 was kidding themselves. You can't blame Sutter for Kadri scoring at his career pace.Kadri and Huberdeau were game changers last year and look nowhere close right now.
i meant for a player the team signed to high AAV, and for an extended period of time.
To be fair, anyone (including tre) who expected Kadri to be worth 7 x 7 was kidding themselves. You can't blame Sutter for Kadri scoring at his career pace.
Some of the worst hockey to watch also. Rim it around and take crap shots from the point.. we don't even have traffic most of the time. Transition is slow as hell and no game breakers.
Sorry but the bolded are not serious responses. I expect better from you as a poster tbh.
As for the rest of your points, I can say 2 quick things. Past results do not equal future success, and not every coach gives "their guy" the lions share of starts. When Mike Smith went from borderline vezina caliber to swiss cheese caliber, Peters gave Rittich the net for much of 2018-19 for example.
And as for your second point, saying that "well things can get worse" is not a ringing endorsement of anyone nor should it absolve criticism for anyone. This product sucks right now, and if we miss the playoffs Sutter deserves to be fired considering the roster we have right now. Kadri and Huberdeau were game changers last year and look nowhere close right now.
i meant for a player the team signed to high AAV, and for an extended period of time.
Don't really post here to meet your expectations tbh.
It's not even an opinion, it's an observable fact.
All of Saros, Demko, Campbell, Shesterkin, Quick, Vasilevskiy, Jones, Gibson, and Bobrovsky have struggled to start the year with SV%s well below their career averages. All of them have started at least 12 games with most over 15. So saying starting a struggling starter is exclusively a Darryl Sutter issue is just empirically false, just a cursory glance at data from this very season proves it quite obviously BS.
Where do I say it absolves him of criticism? Says right there in the post you quoted he's not infallible and has made plenty of decisions worthy of criticism.
We haven't missed the playoffs yet, but go ahead and yearn for Mike Yeo or whoever if you want.
Yeah I mean Petersen sucked for a calendar year before that, just that game in particular was a straw that broke the camel's back situation.
Never said you were absolving him of criticism, just saying that it doesn’t. And frankly, I do not care much for other teams as an excuse for continually playing markstrom. I gave an example of a flames coach demoting a starter, we can do the same again.
Yearn for Mike yeo? Get out of here with the straw mans Bounces. Seems the team doing poorly is making people pissy around flamesnation. I’m pissy too, but frankly a discussion like this does no one any good when it’s just taking jabs at other posters.