Modern-Day (80 Game) Great Players Who Surprisingly Didn't Score 50 Goals in a Season

Tofveve

Registered User
Mar 10, 2013
27,258
10,895
The West
- Darryl Sittler (best was 45, even with a 10 pt game record)

- Dennis Savard (47)

- Peter Stastny (47)

- Eric Lindros (47)

- Matts Sundin (47)

- Pavel Datsyuk (32)

- Ron Francis (32)

- Peter Forsberg (30)

I just found some of these names surprising. Lindros' name actually surprises me the most. That Legion of Doom line was so amazing in the 90s - his linemate Leclaire had 3 consecutive 50+ goal seasons.

On the low end, I'm surprised at Forsberg's and Datsyuk's low goal-scoring numbers. Not so surprised at Francis', as he was that perennial playmaker.
 
Last edited:

95Tal

Registered User
Jan 15, 2019
122
170
Portland, Oregon
There have been a lot of highly skilled European players that I think could have easily broken 50 but didn't for various reasons. A few that come to mind initially:

Alex Kovalev (44)

Kent Nilsson (49)

Tomas Sandstrom (45 in 68 games)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sk8M8

Tofveve

Registered User
Mar 10, 2013
27,258
10,895
The West
Lindros does surprise me. The rest, not so much. I'm actually pretty surprised Sundin got so close. His big thing, it always seemed to me, was consistency, rather than gaudy numbers. Having Ron Francis on the list is kind of like having Adam Oates on it.

Yeah, definitely Lindros is the most surprising.

I think Sittler is also quite surprising. Savard too.
 

DFC

Registered User
Sep 26, 2013
47,119
23,157
NB
Yeah, definitely Lindros is the most surprising.

I think Sittler is also quite surprising. Savard too.

I guess sometimes it feels like 50 goal-scorers grew on trees in the 70s and 80s, but then when you look at it, they really didn't. At least not to the extent it sometimes seems.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sk8M8

Tofveve

Registered User
Mar 10, 2013
27,258
10,895
The West
I guess sometimes it feels like 50 goal-scorers grew on trees in the 70s and 80s, but then when you look at it, they really didn't. At least not to the extent it sometimes seems.

But Lindros felt like a Lemieux almost. I mean both Crosby and Malkin scored 50. And like I said earlier, Eric's linemate John Leclair scored 3 consecutive ones. Crazy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Anisimovs AK

DFC

Registered User
Sep 26, 2013
47,119
23,157
NB
But Lindros felt like a Lemieux almost. I mean both Crosby and Malkin scored 50. And like I said earlier, Eric's linemate John Leclair scored 3 consecutive ones. Crazy.

I never saw Lindros as being close to Lemieux. Nor anyone not named Gretzky, really.
 

Tofveve

Registered User
Mar 10, 2013
27,258
10,895
The West
I never saw Lindros as being close to Lemieux. Nor anyone not named Gretzky, really.

That probably came out wrong. No he wasn't regarded on that level, but before all the injuries there were predictions that he could be the next one in that lineage of generational talents. And when he was healthy he was a unique force, a game-changer similar to the big names before him.
 

135ace

Registered User
Mar 18, 2015
1,734
850
I never saw Lindros as being close to Lemieux. Nor anyone not named Gretzky, really.

It’s really just the hype. Lindros had so much damn hype that it’s caused a bias. I was a young kid when he came into the league, but part of me sort of naively assumes/falsely remembers him as being better than he was. For example in the late 90s Jagr was tearing up the league, but until recently looking back on that time in depth I would have said Lindros was the best player in the league (just based off the hype that I still remember). Hell, he probably got more coverage than Jagr, Federov and Forsberg combined, all of whom had more impressive careers than him.
 

Backhandbeauty

Registered User
Dec 28, 2018
328
443
It’s really just the hype. Lindros had so much damn hype that it’s caused a bias. I was a young kid when he came into the league, but part of me sort of naively assumes/falsely remembers him as being better than he was. For example in the late 90s Jagr was tearing up the league, but until recently looking back on that time in depth I would have said Lindros was the best player in the league (just based off the hype that I still remember). Hell, he probably got more coverage than Jagr, Federov and Forsberg combined, all of whom had more impressive careers than him.
It wasn't just hype. If you look sr his early years he had a really high ppg rate one of the highest ever. I can't remember exactly but I think it was around top 5 or 6 over his first 5 years. People used that to rank him in a historic sense ignoring that it was always going to drop and he was never going to be able to stay healthy.

His early season numbers were impressive as hell, though. Guy had the total package but health even before the brain damage.
 

DFC

Registered User
Sep 26, 2013
47,119
23,157
NB
It’s really just the hype. Lindros had so much damn hype that it’s caused a bias. I was a young kid when he came into the league, but part of me sort of naively assumes/falsely remembers him as being better than he was. For example in the late 90s Jagr was tearing up the league, but until recently looking back on that time in depth I would have said Lindros was the best player in the league (just based off the hype that I still remember). Hell, he probably got more coverage than Jagr, Federov and Forsberg combined, all of whom had more impressive careers than him.

Lindros and Fedorov are comparable to me. Both had dominant peaks, but spent most of their careers being a shell of the players we remember them as. I had pretty much the same experience with Lindros as you. I was pretty young, but I clearly remember the hype, and people literally calling him "the next Gretzky." Maybe because Gretz was still around, we didn't realize just how rare that caliber of player is.

It seems, in hindsight, like there was a brief period (I think when Mario was out with cancer?) where Lindros probably was the best player in the league. And that LOD line, as a unit, was the most feared thing in hockey. So yeah, I was genuinely surprised to see he topped out at 47.
 

PurpleMouse

Registered User
Apr 27, 2014
393
171
Stastny and Savard are the only truly surprising ones to me on this list.

Lindros and Sundin would hit 50 if they had the exact same type of careers, but were born a few years earlier.

Francis, Datsyuk and Forsberg are pass first guys.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Anisimovs AK

WetcoastOrca

Registered User
Jun 3, 2011
38,315
22,219
Vancouver, BC
Lindros was a unique and dominant physical player but his peak was just a lot shorter than most others. If you watched him play you’d understand why the raw numbers don’t really do him justice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sk8M8

authentic

Registered User
Jan 28, 2015
25,853
10,917
It’s always surprising to be reminded that Forsberg topped out at 30.

I don't think there has been a better forward who has a lower career high in goals. He actually has a higher goals per game in the playoffs than the following players though:

Crosby
Malkin
Jagr
Fedorov
Selanne
Stamkos
Kovalchuk
 

ek93

Registered User
Dec 28, 2014
1,664
1,187
New York
Ziggy Palffy scored 40+ three times, but topped out at 48. Tough to say what kind of numbers he could have put up if his health had held out. One of the game's forgotten goal-scorers.
You ain't lying. Literally read the name and said, "holy shit I forgot about that guy."
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad