The Red Line
Registered User
- Oct 11, 2010
- 8,456
- 4,902
You ain't lying. Literally read the name and said, "holy **** I forgot about that guy."
Lindros likely has multiple 50-goal seasons if not for having a head full of jelly.
Yeah I certainly am not surprised he didnt hit 50 but that is lower than expected even with the injuriesIt’s always surprising to be reminded that Forsberg topped out at 30.
It’s always surprising to be reminded that Forsberg topped out at 30.
I was never a fan of Lindros. I guess it’s just because he was always the enemy. In hindsight, I wish he was able to stick around longer.Lindros was a unique and dominant physical player but his peak was just a lot shorter than most others. If you watched him play you’d understand why the raw numbers don’t really do him justice.
In a similar vein there's Lanny McDonald who played for some very good team, scored over 1000 points and had a career high 66 goals in a season. Lanny McDonald, surprisingly, never broke 100 points.
His highest scoring year was 66-32-98.
Stamkos is his modern-day equivalent. Stamkos too has yet to score 100 points, despite having a 60+ goal season.
94-95 was probably the season you could argue Lindros was the best. He was still 21-22 at the time. His problem (before the main injuries came) was that he could not stay healthy. He topped out at something like 60-75 games every year even before the concussions. It took him around 60 games to reach 40 goals so I'm sure he would have had a few 50 seasons if not for that fact.Lindros and Fedorov are comparable to me. Both had dominant peaks, but spent most of their careers being a shell of the players we remember them as. I had pretty much the same experience with Lindros as you. I was pretty young, but I clearly remember the hype, and people literally calling him "the next Gretzky." Maybe because Gretz was still around, we didn't realize just how rare that caliber of player is.
It seems, in hindsight, like there was a brief period (I think when Mario was out with cancer?) where Lindros probably was the best player in the league. And that LOD line, as a unit, was the most feared thing in hockey. So yeah, I was genuinely surprised to see he topped out at 47.
Playmakers make plays.
Craziest fact in the thread. Always assumed Lanny had multiple 100 point seasons.
Lindros would have been an all time great had it not been for injuries. Injuries prevented him from doing a lot which included scoring 50 goals in a year.
I too was surprised by Naslund as someone else mentioned. Some others:
- Daniel Alfredsson (only once hit 90 points too)
- Mike Modano (Only hit 50 goals once...never even topped 40 again)
- Marty St Louis (43)
- Dave Andreychuk (Despite 640 goals the longevity king only hit 50 goals once over his career)
Lol, if he wouldn’t have spent half his career acting like he played soccer in la liga, he probably would’ve scored more. His nickname of “floppa” suited him well.0.35 goals per game in the regular season. 0.42 goals per game in the playoffs, where it's harder to score. Forsberg obviously didn't focus on scoring goals in the regular season, but on driving the play and being a playmaker. Had he focused on goal scoring in the regular season he probably could have hit 40 with relative ease. Probably not 50 though.
He has a good case for most underrated player of all time. Heck, no one even rates him anymore.