KallioWeHardlyKnewYe
Hey! We won!
- May 30, 2003
- 15,529
- 3,380
It wasn't that long ago that the league pretty much made it clear that it was down to St. Louis and Sacramento, but the next team that gets added would be the other city.Yea I doubt St Louis getting a team would block Sacramento from getting one. If they don’t get one MLS was never really interested to begin with.
2023-2024 probably if 28/29 are 2021-2022. Phoenix the favorite right now?So when do we get to 30 teams?
You do realize the concept of state is arbitrary right?Why would they add another team in California? Put one in Phoenix in you need another Western conference one. To me Texas with Austin coming should be tapped out and California should be with Sacramento not getting a team. I don't see any reason why any state should have even 3 teams let alone 4. Most stadiums are 20k, you don't need to be in the most populated states to fill a stadium. All this expansion is just watering down the league even more.
Yeah why does the EPL only have 20 teams? Explain this to me the richest league in the world knows that 20 teams is enough to protect the quality and MLS wants to expand non stop even doing so with teams who have no soccer stadiums and no real grass. This year I've seen to many mediocre games in front of empty stadiums and fake grass.Why would they add another team in California? Put one in Phoenix in you need another Western conference one. To me Texas with Austin coming should be tapped out and California should be with Sacramento not getting a team. I don't see any reason why any state should have even 3 teams let alone 4. Most stadiums are 20k, you don't need to be in the most populated states to fill a stadium. All this expansion is just watering down the league even more.
Because England basically has the population of California and Pennsylvania. The United States can support a bigger league, it's just about getting to a point where South American players view it as a more advantageous route towards Europe. No reason the MLS can't act as a feeder league to Europe. Should be able to pay more than the South American leagues and can offer a higher quality of life.Yeah why does the EPL only have 20 teams? Explain this to me the richest league in the world knows that 20 teams is enough to protect the quality and MLS wants to expand non stop even doing so with teams who have no soccer stadiums and no real grass. This year I've seen to many mediocre games in front of empty stadiums and fake grass.
Why does it matter about state? In Sac everyone goes to Sac Republic games not Earthquakes.Why would they add another team in California? Put one in Phoenix in you need another Western conference one. To me Texas with Austin coming should be tapped out and California should be with Sacramento not getting a team. I don't see any reason why any state should have even 3 teams let alone 4. Most stadiums are 20k, you don't need to be in the most populated states to fill a stadium. All this expansion is just watering down the league even more.
Yeah, it's more about the cities. Ohio has 2 teams, Missouri more or less will have 2 teams.Why does it matter about state? In Sac everyone goes to Sac Republic games not Earthquakes.
Yeah why does the EPL only have 20 teams? Explain this to me the richest league in the world knows that 20 teams is enough to protect the quality and MLS wants to expand non stop even doing so with teams who have no soccer stadiums and no real grass. This year I've seen to many mediocre games in front of empty stadiums and fake grass.
I think eventually there will be relegation/promotion. Just need to make the league more attractive.I would say they have more, since the championship, league 1, league 2 etc are all eligible for the EPL
USL etc are not eligible for MLS
None of the owners would agree to it.I think eventually there will be relegation/promotion. Just need to make the league more attractive.
There's only 20 at any given time, and they're the ones getting the moneys, so I wouldn't say they have more. I suppose one could try including those teams presently receiving parachute payments if one wanted to be really picky, but I don't really know that system all that well (yes, I'm one of those American soccer fans that doesn't see the appeal of pro/rel; maybe it has something to do with following another Have/Have Not oriented league in the form of NCAA football).I would say they have more, since the championship, league 1, league 2 etc are all eligible for the EPL
USL etc are not eligible for MLS
Pro/rel is good for the more neutral fans and then fans of clubs that wouldn't make the top 20/30 clubs that would be in the top tier permanently. I'm not sure why the owners or players would ever want that in a CBA negotiation, it wouldn't benefit either party, and definitely hurts the owners.There's only 20 at any given time, and they're the ones getting the moneys, so I wouldn't say they have more. I suppose one could try including those teams presently receiving parachute payments if one wanted to be really picky, but I don't really know that system all that well (yes, I'm one of those American soccer fans that doesn't see the appeal of pro/rel; maybe it has something to do with following another Have/Have Not oriented league in the form of NCAA football).
I think eventually there will be relegation/promotion. Just need to make the league more attractive.
I think eventually there will be relegation/promotion. Just need to make the league more attractive.
Zero chance seems extreme. None of us know for sure.there is zero chance there will ever be relegation in MLS
You would be asking the MLS owners to accept the possibility of losing a ton of money. I don't even know why the players would advocate it either. It only benefits people not associated with the MLS.Zero chance seems extreme. None of us know for sure.
Agree there...I have long said MLS will get to 40 and do pro/rel themselves then continue bleeding USL teams in until there are 3 tiers