Pavels Dog
Registered User
Unfortunately I bet a ton of teams feel like they could have given a better offer if all things were equal. But if a player indicates he has a very small list of teams he is willing to sign for, and you're not on that list? Even if something like Cholowski+2nd might seem like an equal offer to NYR, it would look like a terrible deal if we ended up just getting a rental and in 5 years Cholowski is a top-pairing D or the 2nd round picks turns into another Hronek for example.I mean, an elite #1D would be ideal but beggars can't be choosers. I'll take any #1 at this point. What's concerning to me is that we just saw one go for a late 1st and Neal Pionk and we still couldn't pony up. Forget elite #1, swinging any kind of deal for a #1 is clearly an ongoing concern for this team.
Imo, the time to truly hunt for those kind of trades is not quite here yet. Get the foundation through the draft, then explore trades when you start to figure out what you're missing.