bearcountry17
Registered User
Dude.... you just got a top prospect for a third liner that's Anne Frank in the offensive end... settle down.
A 3rd liner that produces ES offence at a borderline 1st line level.
Dude.... you just got a top prospect for a third liner that's Anne Frank in the offensive end... settle down.
He was on a line with Granlund or Staal a lot. Pretty sure he won't be playing with Pasta. Anything called Krejci, DeBrusk, Heinen is not a help.A 3rd liner that produces ES offence at a borderline 1st line level.
A 3rd liner that produces ES offence at a borderline 1st line level.
My friends and I call this wrench chattingA 3rd liner that produces ES offence at a borderline 1st line level.
He was on a line with Granlund or Staal a lot. Pretty sure he won't be playing with Pasta. Anything called Krejci, DeBrusk, Heinen is not a help.
He was on a line with Granlund or Staal a lot. Pretty sure he won't be playing with Pasta. Anything called Krejci, DeBrusk, Heinen is not a help.
How does he produce ES offense at a borderline 1st line level?
EDIT: Just checked, over the past 3 seasons combined he ranks in the high 70s in ES points and ES points/60. But if you make it just the past two seasons, he is 137th in even strength points and 113th in ES points/60. And just this season, he is 146th in even strength points and 182nd in ES points/60.
So, basically, he did produce ES offense at a bonafide 1st line level in 2016-2017, has declined in two straight seasons, and hasn't come close to that level since then. But his numbers in 2016-2017 were so strong that they drive his aggregate numbers over the past 3 years up to borderline 1st line level.
I don't think you can call him a player that produces ES offense at a borderline 1st line level. I think you can call him a middle-6 player that has historically produced and does produce like a middle-6 player outside of one outlier season.
You think playing with Krejci and Debrusk is not a step up for Coyle? It appears you have a narrative laid out and must make it work ignoring any evidence on the contrary.
Dude.... you just got a top prospect for a third liner that's Anne Frank in the offensive end... settle down.
Dude.... you just got a top prospect for a third liner that's Anne Frank in the offensive end... settle down.
I'd say it's lateral, if anything I'd lean a slight step down
In no particular order prospects ahead of Donato
Cehlarik
JFK
Bjork
Lauzon
Frederic
Vaakanainen
Studincka
Lauko
Donato was in the range of 6-10 for Bruins best prospect
And that’s not really a good thing considering the bruins have a pretty weak prospect system currently
Looks like he will be 3C and 2nd PP to start
Until Pasta is back I’m guessing we’ll role with something like
Marchand Bergeron Heinen
DeBrusk Krejci Kuhlman
Nordstrom Coyle Cehlarik
Kuraly Acciari Wagner
Backes
I think Cehlarik was returned to Providence if I'm not mistaken.
Paper transaction to complete the deal he will be called up for Saturday’s game against STL if healthy enough...or if not they will call him up after the trade deadline when there is no roster limits...but he’s not reporting to Providence
Good, I thought he has played pretty well and I want to see him get some more time.
Did Donato's value plummet over last year? I swear Bruins fans were talking about him like he was untouchable at one point, now they seem happy to get rid of hin.