I see what you mean. I just mean that there are so many factors at play here. Take an irresponsible player and put them in a better situation, and sometimes they react in good ways. Take a great player but put them in a bad situation, and bad habits can take over their game. A lot of time confidence can be a team wide thing, and once a good enough run gets going, things can snowball where everyone is happy and confident, and it actually makes them work harder in all aspects
True... and I agree with this... in fact nearly every goalie is aware of this, but on a good team it can't be one-sided or an unequally shared responsibility (establishing team confidence).
A big save
can change the team's confidence... but what are we really saying here?
That a goalie is responsible for allowing 24 guys to feel like it's ok to make a mistake? The goalie, in addition to making zero mistakes himself (which is a very high psychological bar) is responsible for maintaining the psychology of his team-mates when they make a mistake? That's fine as an ideal, but not as an expectation unless the corollary is also true.
It would be like a goalie saying: it's ok that I make a mistake, Connor will get one back. Is that goalie going to play better or worse with that mentality? Worse most likely.
What eats goalies up, is having 28 shots on goal, making 25 solid saves, making one mistake that is a goal and also allowing two unstoppable goals. Meanwhile his "best" offensive defenseman makes 3 terrible pinches that lead to breakaways against (goalie only stops 2) and his "best" offensive winger fails to get the puck out at the blue line 5 times (by being soft, or trying to be fancy), including one on the first shift of the game which leads to a clean 5-hole goal (judged as a mistake on the goalie since it was the first shot of the game).
Goalie finishes with an 0.892 SPCT and wears the goat horns, despite playing an A- game while several of his best teammates played B- at best.