That actually is not what it's all about. We cannot count on this management, ownership and whatever to be clairvoyant. Bergevin should have never received a 5-year extension. Same for Julien. Nobody should and can trust this management. So if the end result as to be the firing of Bergie, yes, you have to unfortunately wish that most moves won't work. Not because you hate the team but because you like it so much that failing hard seems, for them, to be the only way they can be obligated to move. Geez, we keep failing in the AHL and we still to this day have the same coach. Imagine if we would have had a winning season this year....he would have probably gotten another 3-year extension. At one point, if they keep losing, they will have no choice but to look elsewhere. Yet again, if we would have a more clairvoyant management, we wouldn't have to wish hell to our team. It can't be more clearer than this.
Besides, in any sane world, seeing Reilly, Valiev or whoever filler succeed should NOT stop from thinking that the GM is still not the right man for the job. It shouldn't. But it's not too far fetch to think that this is what Molson thinks. And that this is why some want to see those kids fail.
Bergevin has no slept with anybody's wife on this board. If people hate him and want him gone is totally linked to his job as GM. And their beliefe that to see him gone, we need him to be totally unsuccesful as the owner could take whatever win as a sign of how great his GM is.
Fine, you hate the guy, you hate the guy, I'm so good with that, but since when is the urge to hate a GM supercede the success of the team?? It's clearly become more of that on these boards. It ain't Canadiens discussion anymore, it's become a place to vent ones hate. Since when is "f*** you Bergevin" become a point of discussion after a HABS win?
If he makes a good aquisition, why not like it? Why automatically hate it? Why automatically peg it as a disaster of a trade.....oh no, we gave up a 5th rounder in 2019 (WAS) for Reilly who's already posted 3pts........I know if it would be the other way around, if we traded Reilly, it would be repeated that the Washington 5th is practically a 6th, but in this case, it's a 5th for a depth D on Minnesota, no mention of that 5th practically being a 6th.
How quickly we forget how this organization gave up on Pateryn and that he's doing so well in Dallas but when we aquire a D from another organization, the notion of that D becoming anything is quickly squashed and will be disproved at all cost. So it's possible for D or forwards to leave here and become something, but impossible the other way around?
If Bergevins next 4 moves involve getting a true number one centre, a #2LHD, gets rid of Pacioretty for good young prospects and drafts really good young players in 2018.......what would be your reaction? Would it be to trying to disprove everything he's done? Or would you give him props and support him?
Wasn't it nice to see Juulsen and Reilley play the way they did last night?