LouJersey
Registered User
I think Sweeney plan is both them next 3 yrs which is fine by me .Ullmark is not going anywhere with that no trade .
and Rask signs a two year deal with Toronto?
I think Sweeney plan is both them next 3 yrs which is fine by me .Ullmark is not going anywhere with that no trade .
Myself I would rather the other 2 moving forward after this season.Good goalies with 1 young enough to be here years.They get along great to .Donnie can't do nothing with Ullmark cause Linus holds the cardsand Rask signs a two year deal with Toronto?
Myself I would rather the other 2 moving forward.Good goalies with 1 young enough to be here years.They get along great to .
ThisYou trade Ullmark and keep Swayman
I think Sweeney plan is both them next 3 yrs which is fine by me .Ullmark is not going anywhere with that no trade .
You may or may not be talking about me, but I freely admit the Bruins are playing much better than I thought they would as of late. I’ve said on here before that I’m in favor of a complete rebuild, but if this franchise can win games and contend, I’m thrilled to be wrong.Red that over here too.
Tough time for the « sell everything this team is not good and not a contender » crowd.
Meanwhile, the disappointing wins are pilling on and Bruins 5pts back Toronto with a game in hand.
Too bad these takes refuse to be "cancelled".
He only "refused to be cancelled" after he collected every last penny of his contract too. Poor guy.seriously, weren’t ppl upset because he got “cancelled?”
He suggests trading a new popular Bruin every week. I f***in wish he got cancelled, instead we have to hear him more
Swayman might end up being a good goalie for years to come. But he might not, either. Especially with goalies, it’s so hard to predict and many peter out. Bergeron (not really having an all-star year) is getting old. Trades are something you consider. He’s not untouchable. Now, whether I trust DS to make a smart deal? Another story entirely.
lolNow theres a guy you wanna take trade advice from.
The putz.
Aren't the fish sticks still paying Dipietro?
1.5 million a year until 2029.
he will have ‘earned’ 67 million by then.
I was imprecise in my writing. I was actually referring to Swayman not being untouchable.As close to untouchable as anyone could be.
How DARE you?Taking an opinion from Millbury on trading high end prospects is like taking an opinion on climate change from Greta Thunberg. Take your opinion from actual experts.
This.If the price is right, you trade anyone. If Edmonton insists on Swayman in a package for Draisaitl, pull the trigger.
Ullmark has a NMC this year and next. The following 2yrs it'd a 16 then 15 no trade list. The fact that he got a NMC for the first 2 years tells me they (he and is agent) knew Rask could come back and for more then 1yr so they wanted to be able to have say on where Ullmark goes if traded.
If Rask comes back for next season then I think you see Ullmark moved during the off-season when teams have more flexibility and guys are moving around. There could be a prime opportunity that opens with a playoff team who needs a #1 goalie.
The only way I would consider trading Swayman would be to get a young elite center back in return. I have much more faith in the Bruins finding another starter in net than finding the next top line center.
In short - I don’t move Swayman for anything less than a number one center. Period. Otherwise, Swayman should stay here.
Just because I joined this forum in 2011 certainly doesn’t mean I haven’t been watching Bruins hockey for much longer than that."I have much more faith in the Bruins finding another starter in net"
I see you joined the forum in 2011.
You may not not remember the pre-2011 goalies. Thomas to Rask has been amazing, before that it was a revolving door in front of the B's net.