Shaman464
No u
Nows the time to see if we can get anything for Kindl or Big E and possibly need to trade Marchy or XO unfortunately as I like them, but no room for both.
KFQ+Big E+Kindl+2016 first for McJesus e6
Nows the time to see if we can get anything for Kindl or Big E and possibly need to trade Marchy or XO unfortunately as I like them, but no room for both.
Kronwall-Smith
DD-Green
Big-E/Quincey - XO/Marchenko
We now have 3 of the bottom 20 D who 'led' in minus turnovers.
Don't care about the shiny offensive numbers - we just got worse.
KFQ+Big E+Kindl+2016 first for McJesus e6
the fact that Kronwall is one of those 3 shows how silly that stat of yours is
know who else is on that list?
ALL THREE NORRIS FINALISTS
Not a Green-fan but at 3 years I like the signing. As a #4-5+PP guy he should make us better.
Kronner-E
DD-Green
Quincey-Smith
XO/Marchy
Looks good.
Waive Kindl and\or trade Quincey for a pick, field a D group of Kronwall-Green, Smith-Dekeyser, Marchenko-Ericsson. Marchenko and Ouelette rotate in and out of last spot.
Slotting green into the top-4 moves everyone down where they belong.
Washington also had 3 defenseman who would've been top-pair on our team.
edit: Looking at their roster, any one of their defenseman would've automatically slotted into our top-4. So there is that. In Detroit Green will be playing behind a forward group that is one of the most defensively responsible in the NHL. Rafalski wasn't that sharp on defense either.
Green for 3 years is amazing. He wasn't a super long term solution but he is an ideal fit right now. We need a RH dman that could put up points and that is exactly what we got. If he can put up 40-50 pts, I don't care if hes on the 1st, 2nd, or 3rd pair.
Right now I'd run:
Kronner-Smith
Dekeyser-Green
E/Q-Marchenko
I think this means Q is getting traded. One of the kids needs a spot and we can't get rid of E with his contract and NTC (I think?). It makes no sense to have a 8mil 3rd pair, when we can have kids that are equally as good. If we can trade Kindl, maybe they'll hold onto both but one of the 3 has to be moved. Q is probably the only one with value, as he has a year left, and is coming off a really solid deal.
Yeah, but the Caps have such a good defense that your #5 is in our top 4.You will love him on the PP. Dont expect him to be a top 4 D every night though. He was #5 on the Caps.
KFQ+Big E+Kindl+2016 first for McJesus e6
I think this means Q is getting traded. One of the kids needs a spot and we can't get rid of E with his contract and NTC (I think?). It makes no sense to have a 8mil 3rd pair, when we can have kids that are equally as good. If we can trade Kindl, maybe they'll hold onto both but one of the 3 has to be moved. Q is probably the only one with value, as he has a year left, and is coming off a really solid deal.