obey86
Registered User
- Jun 9, 2009
- 8,013
- 1,274
So basically the best I can get here is "We could go on a run" "Our chances are as good as any team's" i.e. the same stuff I've heard ahead of the last 5 seasons.
Does it make the Wings a better team? Perhaps. Is it good to be a better team if you don't have the pieces to win the Cup anyway? I doubt it.
The timing on this is all off. Ca. 2009/2010 we never got the top six forward we needed to go back to the top. Then when first Rafalski and then Lidstrom left we treated the likes of Kyle Quincey as a solution on D. Now years later with our elite players being far closer to retirement than a return to peak form, you go and sign an expensive free agent D-man. If there is a *plan* to win the Cup, Holland is doing a great job obscuring it because it sure feels like he's either very confused about the year we're in or just throwing crumbs to a fan base that *is* very confused about the year we're in.
Man I don't get people.
If Holland doesn't improve the team: "He's sitting on his hands again, he never even tries to improve the team."
If Holland signs Green to fill the team's biggest weakness, an offensive RHD the Wings have needed: "Why did Kenny do this move, what's the point? What an idiot."
If it would be more appealing to you for the Red Wings get high draft pick after high draft pick and stink seasons on end just become a Hurricanes fan or something.
No matter what he does, outside of trading Kyle Quincey in a package for Shea Weber, you guys will criticize his moves. He filled the team's biggest need at a reasonable term/cost and made them better and for some reason that move was dumb. You make no sense.