stranger34
Registered User
I'm happy MDC is even in the conversation at all at the NHL level. It feels not that long ago that the in thing to do was to label him a bust.
Thought he played well in spurts. Deserves at least another game with Barzal. We need somebody to start putting the puck in the net with some consistencyHe played well tonight
I thought Dal Colle was ok with Barzal tonight. I remember 2 decent chances they created. That’s enough for me to keep him on the 1st line for another game.MDC plays a very predictable game, has shown to be quite reliable defensively. I am also very interested to see how he plays with Barzal and what kind of chemistry that could develop.
I do have concerns about the fit though. Dal Colle offers very little in zone exits and handling the puck through the neutral zone so far. He doesn't have the skating ability to be a strong zone entry guy either. Barzal will have to carry the puck a ton with MDC and Bailey, teams can swarm him again. When Beauvillier is going well, he takes a ton of pressure off Barzal in those facets so he is free to seek open ice while someone else transports the puck.
Dal Colle is here because he fits into the coaches system more than because of his individual talent. The fact that he is making the most of his expanded role on Barzal’s line is to his credit. Not convinced MDCis a keeper yet, just taking it game by game. So far he hasn’t hurt the team.It's really been a hell of a turnaround for his kid considering what his preseason stock was. It's too early to know whether he's going to stick, but the trends seem to be pointing up. I'd like to see him get on the scoreboard a bit more, but the team as a whole is going through a slump there, so let's be patient. He's doing the other little things right, and it looks like Trotz is starting to trust him.
Your point is?If im not mistaken MDC was sitting on bench in OT and during shootout.
If im not mistaken MDC was sitting on bench in OT and during shootout.
Your point is?
Anders Lee never plays in OT and won’t get into the shootout until it gets into the 8th round. Doesn’t mean I don’t want him here. He has a role.
So is Anders Lee not clutch or does 3 on 3 OT not mesh with his skill set?Clutch players are relied upon at the most important moments of a game.
Uh, I hate to be the one to break it to you, but that's not a slump we're in. That's our offense.It's really been a hell of a turnaround for his kid considering what his preseason stock was. It's too early to know whether he's going to stick, but the trends seem to be pointing up. I'd like to see him get on the scoreboard a bit more, but the team as a whole is going through a slump there, so let's be patient. He's doing the other little things right, and it looks like Trotz is starting to trust him.
This has absolutely nothing to do with his 5v5 play. Tavares was hot garbage at OT and the shootout.If im not mistaken MDC was sitting on bench in OT and during shootout.
Are you really comparing MDC to John Tavares?This has absolutely nothing to do with his 5v5 play. Tavares was hot garbage at OT and the shootout.
No, I said one player was bad at OT. The other player hasn’t even touched the ice in OT, so how would we compare them?Are you really comparing MDC to John Tavares?
I have found in my short time on these boards that there is an amazing phenomenon of disingenuousness that occurs regularly; if a person happens to mention two players of disparate abilities in the same sentence in order to make a point, that person will immediately be accused likening one to the other though it was clearly not his or her intention to do so.No, I said one player was bad at OT. The other player hasn’t even touched the ice in OT, so how would we compare them?
Leo Komarov is a better PKer than John Tavares, but that doesn’t mean that Leo is better overall. [Mod]
He most definitely was not doing that. Such BS.Are you really comparing MDC to John Tavares?
I don’t get it. People routinely disregard the fact that players have specific roles which have no impact on overall ability or skill.I have found in my short time on these boards that there is an amazing phenomenon of disingenuousness that occurs regularly; if you happen to mention two players of disparate abilities in the same sentence in order to make a point, you will immediately be accused likening one to the other though it was clearly not your intention to do so.
I don’t get it. People routinely disregard the fact that players have specific roles which have no impact on overall ability or skill.