clydesdale line
Connor BeJesus
- Jan 10, 2012
- 24,713
- 22,895
C’s get degrees!And to be clear, it's not bad on it's own. It doesn't bother me much...until I put in the aggregate of moves.
One time they gave out a C to somebody I think. They're worse than college professors now.
Message from Lafferty.
Yes, the protection is on one year only.Question if somehow the leafs pick in 25 is in the top 10, does it become unprotected in 26?
Thank you been a while since I’ve had to read about protectionsYes, the protection is on one year only.
Question if somehow the leafs pick in 25 is in the top 10, does it become unprotected in 26?
Hi Hawks fans,
Great trade for both Toronto and Chicago. Hoping you guys can win the Bedard Lottery.
I don’t mean to intrude on your boards but can anyone please confirm if McCabe is stronger as an LD or he is more comfortable as an RD.
Thanks in advance!
KD is playing 4D chess. The rest of the league can't keep up with him.
One team will win rd1. If that team then loses in rd2 they both pick per their regular season ranking.I hope Toronto beats Tampa so Chicago gets a better draft pick, and then I hope they get swept in the 2nd round.
Also, with Kyle saying it was a choice to take Leafs 2025 1st rounder and that it spreads the picks out, I have a feeling we are getting the Rangers 2024 1st rounder.
Well, not really. He is the one that has built the team and has shitty goaltending once again.
He is LD who can play RD if needed for long stretches potentially.
His ability to flip sides also allows for more lineup moves/decisions/injury issues to be resolved.
Right before the trade you said we should trade Lafferty while his value was high and that you were fine trading McCabe as long as we got better than a 2nd. You have a puzzling dislike for Davidson.Davidson saw the rate for good bottom 4/6 type players with good value on future years under contract and quickly corrected the market
He did well to secure employment later, probably with the Leafs.
Retention and too good players under contract for late first and a 2nd unlikely to be in the top 50.
I'm not sure if this is better or worse than the Mrazek trade.
Well at least Gogoiev isn't tying up a contract slot through next year...oh wait.
Does Dubas laugh after these deals that help keep his job or just walk
Lafferty's value was high, higher than a 2nd rounder four years from now imo. That could have easily been beat with a 2nd this year or a 1st for 3rd swap or something like that.Right before the trade you said we should trade Lafferty while his value was high and that you were fine trading McCabe as long as we got better than a 2nd. You have a puzzling dislike for Davidson.
Still have domi and kane to trade, hoping for younger guys, legit near ready prospects and/or picks in THIS draft.So Chicago is on the 2030s plan. Great.
Right, the best thing for the pick we get from TBL is for them to not make it to the ECF and for the teams that do make it to the conference finals to have fewer regular season points than them or at least not be the conference finalists. Aside from that, there really is no difference in being eliminated in the first vs second round.One team will win rd1. If that team then loses in rd2 they both pick per their regular season ranking.
Losing in Rd 1 doesn’t automatically mean picking from 17 to 24.
KD literally said that he wanted later year picks for the potential ability to trade them. If anything, the takeaway from today is maybe he envisions turning the corner on the rebuild sooner than we thought.So Chicago is on the 2030s plan. Great.
Lafferty was not going to fetch a 1st.Lafferty's value was high, higher than a 2nd rounder four years from now imo. That could have easily been beat with a 2nd this year or a 1st for 3rd swap or something like that.
This draft is so widely viewed as the best in ages and we still only have one (our own) top 25 pick so far and this is where the heavy impact guys usually are. We need to get in there as much as possible like st louis and montreal are.
As for mccabe a protected 1st in 2024, well, okay but why give back two 5th rd picks?? For waiver material. Again could have been this year, I bet LA or someone would have surrendered one way or another.
I dont want to hear about too many picks in one draft either---- Can always move out the later ones for future ones to other teams w fewer picks after you grab some top talent. This draft is so strong looking we should grab everything possible for trade ups etc. I sure hope toronto nosedives in a couple of years but they will spend to cap maximum if matthews leaves and still be alright. Just my opinion.