Micklebot
Moderator
- Apr 27, 2010
- 53,811
- 31,014
MD was one of the leagues top centers - Turris was breaking down and his asset value was plummeting. We paid at lot less for MD than what’s been proposed to bring in a player of his value this summer. Just stings we collapsed but the original deal was the type of few fans wanted to push us over the top … or the small market version of that.
He had a great year with us and that type of player (The UFA version of him) would look great with Stutzle.
That's a bit revisionist to say the least.
Duchene had scored at a lower pace than Turris over the previous 3 seasons, and one of those seasons was the one Turris had the horrific Gumby ankle sprain he tried playing through. Turris was outproducing Duchene at the time of the trade that season too, and was coming off a 27 goal season in which he also outproduced Duchene, all the while being a better two way player.
Duchene definitely refound his game in Ottawa, and Turris has sharply regressed since leaving, there's no doubt Duchene was seen as having greater offensive potential due to his skillset, but we weren't trading for a guy viewed as one of the league's top centers anymore,
Heck, NHL.com even ranked Turris (29th) ahead of Duchene (38th) in their fantasy ranking that year
Fantasy center rankings for 2017-18
That said, my concern was less about the value which imo wasn't great, and more about the timing. An upgrade to center midseason wasn't going to right the ship, our team had big flaws after letting Methot go with no suitable replacement, and Karlsson looking like a shell of himself.
To me, the trade appeared to be more about not comiting to term while kicking the can down the road wrt deciding if we needed to go into a rebuild or retool. Turris was always a 1b or top end 2nd line center, so comiting to him before knowing what was happening with the true stars on the team in Karlsson and Stone wasn't ideal.