haakon84
Registered User
- Dec 14, 2003
- 2,553
- 0
Because he was on the verge of retirement? And it took him several years before he was energized enough to return to active hockey? Something that could be missed when you imply that those seasons were consecutive.
There are plenty of plausible answers other than the one you're trying to force upon us. And it's funny how every factual error of yours is automatically deemed minutia.
The verge of retirement? He was 36, the same age Brodeur was when he won his last Vezina. I'm sorry I don't buy it. He had just finished a 67 game season with Buffalo. Also he only faced 70 less shots in 2 less games than the season prior with Buffalo, yet his save % dropped 6 points. From everyones arguments with Hasek you'd believe his save % to be at .955 with a team that Detroit had that year.
In my opinion that Red Wings team was the best team I've ever seen in my life and Hasek put up very Brodeur like numbers.
EDIT - You seem to be talking about a different year than Jim, he is talking about the 01-02 Wings. I don't see any factual error in what he wrote.
Last edited: