Confirmed with Link: Mark Stone signs 3-year deal, $3.5mil cap hit

[Ttracer*]

Too much money, spotlight is on him now and it's highly unlikely Stone can continue this high. Should have let him go imo

 

[BonkTastic]

Too much money, spotlight is on him now and it's highly unlikely Stone can continue this high. Should have let him go imo

If this sentence were a person, I would smash it over the back of the head with a bar stool.

 

[Ice-Tray]

If this sentence were a person, I would smash it over the back of the head with a bar stool.

That seems to be his internet shtick....

 

[playasRus]

Did not realize Stone took time off to try his hand at acting:

 

[Super Cake]

If this sentence were a person, I would smash it over the back of the head with a bar stool.

Can i join you?

 

[DrunkUncleDenis]

Did not realize Stone took time off to try his hand at acting:

If you're gonna bump the thread, at least get a good look alike

 

[BigBush*]

wouldnt surprise me if next season people are talking about Stone's contract being the best in the league

 

[ChocolateLeclaire]

We should swap him for Erik Haula.

 

[Samsquanch]

Too much money, spotlight is on him now and it's highly unlikely Stone can continue this high. Should have let him go imo

I don't even...what is this?

If this sentence were a person, I would smash it over the back of the head with a bar stool.

 

[Boud]

We should swap him for Erik Haula.

What would we need to add?

 

[aragorn]

Too much money, spotlight is on him now and it's highly unlikely Stone can continue this high. Should have let him go imo

You're kidding right? How can you not like Mark Stone? Are you a fan of the team? I don't get it, why do you say this?

Every player in sports is paid too much money in comparison to us. It's the NHL the spotlight is on every player, it's why Subban tried to break his arm. Why can't he continue to play well, he has two other line mates who have continued to play well, why can't he? Why would they have let go of a very good asset for nothing, what kind of asset management is that? You need an explanation.

If this sentence were a person, I would smash it over the back of the head with a bar stool.

 

[DrunkUncleDenis]

What would we need to add?

Matt Puempel, a first round pick, and a really good reuben.

 

[Boud]

Matt Puempel, a first round pick, and a really good reuben.

If the Reuben is from Nates Deli, I think they might accept if we retain 85% of Stone's contract.

 

[HavlatMach9]

We should swap him for Erik Haula.

we get rid of an overpaid rookie, and get a player with sky high potential who will a boost our powerplay

 

[ChocolateLeclaire]

we get rid of an overpaid rookie, and get a player with sky high potential who will a boost our powerplay

He has a really short stick too.

 

[spader]

we get rid of an overpaid rookie, and get a player with sky high potential who will a boost our powerplay

This hurts my brain.

 

[DylanSensFan]

This hurts my brain.

There, there, you will be okay. Welcome aboard the crazy train.

 

[Lenny the Lynx]

This thread sums up summertime hfboards.

 

[BonkTastic]

He has a really short stick too.

I think he scores goals to compensate for his short stick.

 

[Busboy]

wouldnt surprise me if next season people are talking about Stone's contract being the best in the league

If we're including players with restricted negotiating rights than I would imagine McDavid could take that title. But I'm probably one of Stone's biggest believers, so I don't think 80+ points and top 5 in scoring is out of the realm of possibility.

 

[BigBush*]

If we're including players with restricted negotiating rights than I would imagine McDavid could take that title. But I'm probably one of Stone's biggest believers, so I don't think 80+ points and top 5 in scoring is out of the realm of possibility.

People never really include players on their ELCs when talking about players with the best contracts.

I also believe he can be up there in scoring. Not sure about top 5, but top 10-20 for sure i could see