RAFI BOMB
Registered User
- May 11, 2016
- 7,389
- 7,646
His foot speed improved a lot over the season. He actually has pretty good speed in a straight line and is capable of winning lots of short puck races. He could be more fluid and improve his agility though.I think Kastelic had decent to good IQ at the junior level. I think he holds the puck too long at the AHL level and he does little to nothing that is that deceptive, but that last point doesn't matter much for the kind of player being projected here (4th line defensive C). I do think that his foot, hand and brain speed are lacking for an NHL player.
He is defensively responsible and having watched him a ton with the Hitmen I think he has a good work ethic.
I also think that if this player was 6'1 or even 6'2 no one would be talking about him at all. To me that's never a good sign.
That point you bring up about deception is a key one. I don't think he uses much of it. He has good on ice awareness and decent vision so his hockey IQ works well in a cycle game. His ability to read an intercept passes was pretty impressive this year so that was a good sign. I think he was adjusting to the speed of the game so he will need to make some improvements in his mental processing.
His size, strength and physicality are all beneficial to him. If he was smaller maybe he wouldn't be talked about as much but one problem with that kind of logic is that it can be used to evaluate other players by removing traits that they do have. Size, strength and physicality are all positive traits so to remove them when evaluating him doesn't make a ton of sense to me. It would be comparable to evaluating any other prospect and asking what if they weren't as fast, didn't have as good of a shot, didn't have as good passing or puck handling ability, weren't as strong defensively, etc. If a player has those traits then why would we disregard them when evaluating them?