ArGarBarGar
What do we want!? Unfair!
- Sep 8, 2008
- 44,042
- 11,737
Point 1: I went on-record as being in favor of this move; but only as a rental. Lidstrom... he ain't.
Point 2: If you believe that ALL NHL Dmen do not need the ability to "puck-move".... frankly, I don't know what to say.
EDIT: I don't recall Lid's ever being called a "puck-moving" Dman. Could it be because he was a solid, 2-way Dman?
Notice I said "second sentence." That was your first.
Players like Ericsson and Dekeyser are not known as puck-movers because that isn't a type of skill they are exceptional at. Ericsson is a defensive defenseman because that is how he plays, same with DK. Rafalski was a PMD because that was the main skill he was good at.
If Lidstrom went on the market and fans of a team were looking for a PMD, they would jump at the chance to grab him because he excelled at that type of play. Any defensemen you grab through a trade is likely going to have flaws somewhere, especially if they are an available PMD. PMDs who are solid defensively don't often become available.