Ouroboros
There is no armour against Fate
- Feb 3, 2008
- 15,028
- 10,309
He's an ok player on an ok contract. Hard to generate any buzz with that sort of opinion though I guess.
There are two things to consider imo;
1. Had we waited for Zub to play out the season before signing him we likely would have saved on term as he was injured. Unpredictable, but you could argue that was a likely outcome for a defensive D-man.
2. His cap hit could hinder our ability fo sign DeBrincat, and personally I’d take DeBrincat at 9.2 over Zub at 4.6 any and every day.
Meth is neither right or wrong at this point but if Zub’s play continues to trend down (very unlikely) he will become a problem in terms of roster construction.
When did he make the Giroux take?Brann is terrible, giroux will be bad in the room, Zub isn’t top 4. Got it.
I’ve really liked Meth in media, but he’s got some bad f***in takes once in awhile.
Last summer before giroux came here. Actually I think I confused his take w someone else’s. Meths take maybe wasn’t about being good in the room, but didn’t have anything left in the tank, wasn’t a fit for the team? Whatever it was, I remember G called him on it when he went onWhen did he make the Giroux take?
Debrincat at 9.2 could be a heavy anchor to pull along if he doesn't improve alot from this season. I don't see the same risk with Zub. What happened to everyone on here who said it was a great signing a few months ago. If healthy next season I hope and believe Zub will play at a level that warrants his contract!There are two things to consider imo;
1. Had we waited for Zub to play out the season before signing him we likely would have saved on term as he was injured. Unpredictable, but you could argue that was a likely outcome for a defensive D-man.
2. His cap hit could hinder our ability fo sign DeBrincat, and personally I’d take DeBrincat at 9.2 over Zub at 4.6 any and every day.
Meth is neither right or wrong at this point but if Zub’s play continues to trend down (very unlikely) he will become a problem in terms of roster construction.
Weird take when you consider that in today's money the last contract we gave Methot was close to a 6mil x 4 year deal.Methot was a 5 who complimented Karlsson very well. Zub is a guy that people were saying could get 5-6M as a UFA before signing this deal (which was ridiculous at the high end but that's what was being said).
Not so sure about that oneLol Zub is a better player than Methot ever was.
Weird take when you consider that in today's money the last contract we gave Methot was close to a 6mil x 4 year deal.
This idea that all he was is a suitable partner for Karlsson is nonsense. He went pretty much the whole lockout year without Karlsson when cooke sliced him and was carrying Gryba, he was a very effective defensive defensman with or without Karlsson,When you have something that works well you overpay for it. Methot paired well with Karlsson and that's pretty much all I can say about him as a player.