Nac Mac Feegle
wee & free
- Jun 10, 2011
- 34,995
- 9,418
At this point I think the salary isn't the important thing with Methot. I'm sure the money is available but it's probably term and his injury that are a little concerning. I'm sure Murray would be willing to give him 5.5 on a 2-3 year deal but Methot will likely want 5.5 for 5-6-7 years since it's his last shot at a big contract. We know Methot's back is still bothering him so do you really take that chance?! Some say yes without thinking too much but when you really take a second to think about it you better be damn sure his back is fine before you end up spending nearly 30M on a player and then end up with a Horton type situation.
I love Methot, but unless it's conclusive on his back I'd rather trade him .
Agreed.
Only way I sign him for more than 3 years is if there's some sort of guarantee on that back.
Overall, it's a really ****** situation. The team is screwed without him, we're screwed if we sign him and he gets injured all the time, and we're not going to get much of anything for him as a rental.