Statistics are subjective. The sooner you learn that, the sooner you’ll be able to keep up.It factually does not more than offense and goaltending.
That’s just helpful advice. Please don’t report me!
Statistics are subjective. The sooner you learn that, the sooner you’ll be able to keep up.It factually does not more than offense and goaltending.
Particularly when they're not.Particularly when they're true.
Facts aren't.Statistics are subjective.
Particularly when they're true.
Yes in a sense because hockey is more fluid where football is a series of set plays.But in hockey at least, it's not. Offence and goaltending are of equal importance to defence.
Furthermore, to disagree with the saying for that reason is not discounting the importance of defence. As said, it's as important as the other two factors. It's just not MORE important, as the saying implies.
perhaps in NFL football, which is where I believe it comes from originally, it may be more true. I don't know.
Blue and White disease was actually one of my personal favorites.
Probably applicable to this team right now
A number of these stats are recorded subjectively. That doesn’t make them factual. And the advanced metrics miss more data than they record, so even if collection was black and white, how accurate are they?Particularly when they're not.
Facts aren't.
No, they aren't. They are recorded based on set criteria that are the same for everybody, that have been optimized to provide the best reflection of the quantity and quality of opportunities against, that meshes really well with what is seen on the ice. They are not perfect, but nothing is perfect. Not more basic stats. Certainly not your eye test. Fact is they are way better than what anybody else has brought to the table to suggest otherwise. The problem is that many have zero ability to differentiate between good defense and good goaltending.A number of these stats are recorded subjectively.
No, they aren't. They are recorded based on set criteria that are the same for everybody, that have been optimized to provide the best reflection of the quantity and quality of opportunities against, that meshes really well with what is seen on the ice. They are not perfect, but nothing is perfect. Not more basic stats. Certainly not your eye test. Fact is they are way better than what anybody else has brought to the table to suggest otherwise. The problem is that many have zero ability to differentiate between good defense and good goaltending.
Cap implications make that trade worth it in the long run thoug.You have to wonder if the team would have been better off this season with Zaitsev and Brown then Ceci?
Whether or not something meets criteria is subjective, especially a play in professional sports happening extremely fast and including dozens of variables.No, they aren't. They are recorded based on set criteria that are the same for everybody, that have been optimized to provide the best reflection of the quantity and quality of opportunities against, that meshes really well with what is seen on the ice. They are not perfect, but nothing is perfect. Not more basic stats. Certainly not your eye test. Fact is they are way better than what anybody else has brought to the table to suggest otherwise. The problem is that many have zero ability to differentiate between good defense and good goaltending.
Whether or not something meets criteria is subjective, especially a play in professional sports happening extremely fast and including dozens of variables.
Meshes really well with what we see on the ice? Is that another fact? Because now you’re mixing in the eye test which you say is unreliable.
You’re right, some people don’t know what they’re watching.. but there’s a lot of us that do. The eye test can’t possibly absorb and dissect everything that’s happening at one time, but, if you know what you’re looking at and focus on specific things, it’s absolutely more reliable than any statistics. Add in PVR where I can rewind a play and see where/how it fell apart? It’s great.
Modern technology/video has made the eye test far more applicable while advanced analytics are still in their infancy. Someday maybe they’ll be more developed and possibly more useful but right now they’re incredibly flawed.
They can have influences on each other to some extent, just like those things can impact offense as well, but they are all separate things. A good defense does not mean good goaltending.A lot of times good goaltending and good defense go hand in hand. Trust between the goalie and the skaters is huge, and that trust has to be built.
That's a bad excuse. He had no trouble doing well behind one of the worst defense in the league for 3 years. Then the defense improves, and suddenly it's "well Andersen had no chance". No. Andersen's struggles this season are on himself. We should be able to expect him to be at least league average in goaltending behind a league average defense.Andersen definitely does not trust many of the Toronto defensemen, and that’s totally fair. That lack of trust leads to indecision, and that leaves holes.
There was nobody to pass to even remotely in the area, and Andersen looked and saw that well before the shot came. It was from an angle that can never go in.The Foudy goal was a perfect example. Andersen was clearly set up to push off the post because he thought a pass was coming. If he trusted Marincin, he would cave committee to the shooter.
Could always have moved him this off season if it's only cap that's the issue.Cap implications make that trade worth it in the long run thoug.
Really wish we never had to get rid of Brown, you could tell he loved playing for the Maple Leafs!
We should be able to expect him to be at least league average in goaltending behind a league average defense.
Nobody even remotely in the area? Hmmm. Looks to me like Dubois is in the area and caused Anderson to have to play the shot AND pass. Marincin didn’t take either.
It was a bad goal, no question, but wtf were the other 5 Leafs doing? That play should have never happened in the first place.are you really trying to blame anyone other than Andersen for that goal? seriously?
Nobody even remotely in the area? Hmmm. Looks to me like Dubois is in the area and caused Anderson to have to play the shot AND pass. Marincin didn’t take either.
No, not really.Whether or not something meets criteria is subjective
The eye test is unreliable, but you're suggesting the stats are wrong, based on nothing, even when it matches what the eye test shows. If you're not using actual facts, and you're not using the eye test, what exactly are you using?Meshes really well with what we see on the ice? Is that another fact? Because now you’re mixing in the eye test which you say is unreliable.
Are you human? Because if you are, your ability to evaluate and analyze in an accurate way using your eyes is impossible, especially as a casual fan. The ways eyes lie to you have been extensively studied.You’re right, some people don’t know what they’re watching.. but there’s a lot of us that do.
Quite the contrary. It has made things infinitely worse. It allows individuals to focus in on specific mistakes and blend everything else into the background, which means that in 99% of cases, an individual will be able to find a way to blame somebody other than the goaltender, because people don't understand how often mistakes truly happen and end up in nothing, and don't understand how valuable specific types of chances truly are.Add in PVR where I can rewind a play and see where/how it fell apart? It’s great. Modern technology/video has made the eye test far more applicable
We had a league average defense this year. Andersen was bad. Hopefully he can bounce back.Let’s hope Dubas makes some upgrades, builds a league average defense, and then we can see how Andersen plays behind it.