Harman Dayal has finally gotten around to posting the draft-value analysis that he teased right before Botchford's passing.
Behind the Numbers: An analysis of every NHL team’s recent...
I'll excerpt liberally, but this is still only a small part of the whole article. If you're reading this, Athletic people, and want me to take it down, just say the word.
In short, the Canucks have been underperforming versus expected value, but in part that's just because Pettersson hasn't played long enough in the league to bump them up:
Once you turn it into per-game value, the Canucks improve, but it still boils mostly just down to Pettersson and Boeser.
Vancouver owned the fifth highest expected pick value during this time and has capitalized by returning the sixth most value — most of that coming from Elias Pettersson and Brock Boeser, although Jared McCann who’s now with the Penguins also seems to be coming along quite nicely. There’s no doubt that the Canucks have done some good work at the draft under Jim Benning, but I wouldn’t say they’ve been excellent and their performance falls short by some margin when compared to say the Winnipeg Jets in the first four years of their rebuild.
Winnipeg is a good comparable for the Canucks because, for the first five years of their rebuild, they too failed to win the lottery for a top-3 pick. The Jets should be seen as the gold standard for building through the draft as they hit a home-run on every first-round pick during this span (Mark Scheifele, Jacob Trouba, Josh Morrissey, Kyle Connor) and supported that by picking up excellent depth pieces in Adam Lowry and Andrew Copp. The same can’t be said for Vancouver who has missed on grabbing the best player available with both their Virtanen and Olli Juolevi picks. As such, you can see that the Canucks have yielded roughly half the immediate value as the Jets did from their picks, with the gap closing, but remaining at a not insignificant margin when accounting for games played.
As many of us know, the vaunted envy-of-the-league prospect pool is pretty much a myth, as the Canucks just temporarily had better players from being bad,
just like everyone else does.
With an r^2 of 0.39, there’s clearly an inverse relationship with winning and having a strong prospect pool (the more your team wins, typically the weaker your prospects are), which shouldn’t come as much of a surprise.
[...]
Even after including the uber-talented Quinn Hughes, the Canucks place with the 20th ranked NHLe. Olli Juolevi still has second-pairing upside, while Jett Woo and Tyler Madden had a solid draft plus one season, but frankly, almost every pool has prospects of this calibre. Simply put, with Hughes graduating, it’s hard to imagine many needle movers from this pool providing impact within the next couple of seasons.
This is partly in due to the failure of the draft guru to extract much value beyond the first round:
There are eight teams that have yet to draft above replacement level talent during this span: Colorado, Detroit, Edmonton, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Vancouver and Winnipeg. Out of this list, the Jets earn some slack because of how excellent they were at the draft table under the same management in years past. Vancouver, meanwhile, has gotten 281 games played outside of the first-round which can’t be ignored, but it hasn’t translated to much value yet because all of Nikita Tryamkin, Gustav Forsling and Adam Gaudette are still below replacement level. How the Canucks look with respect to their drafting outside the first round under Benning will depend heavily on the development of Gaudette and Thatcher Demko.
In sum: Boston and Tampa are likely the only teams that can even pretend to be "drafting gurus", and even then this is just because of a couple more hits, and the evidence leans pretty heavily in favor of
@Melvin's view that this isn't really a thing.