Dr Quincy
Registered User
- Jun 19, 2005
- 28,704
- 10,562
King was doing his job by misrepresenting Miller's efforts? OK.
Where did I put the responsibility on King for what the Bruins did? There are multiple factors here. You can care about your 5 questions that you'll never get answered. I'll care about mine about the agent because there's something bizarre happening there.
Neither you nor I know whether or not King misrepresented anything. Just because Cam Neely says something doesn't mean it's true, or not true. It would be nice if one of the hack journalists who are more interested in getting in good with the team would ask Neely more about it, or if the B's had been up front with their fans throughout this whole thing.
I don't see anything bizarre in King at all. Either he was truthful, or he wasn't. An agent acting untruthful for his client is unethical, but not in the least "bizarre".
What's bizarre is that the B's considered signing Miller for a long time and either ignored the truth or chose to be the laziest people in professional sports. Which do you think it was?
EDIT: From Boston Hockey Now article in NOV:
"In his press conference Monday morning, Neely repeatedly stressed that he and the Bruins’ hockey operations staff were unaware of a series of transgressions between Miller and Meyer-Crothers that occurred after 2014. Despite various news outlets – many via Miller’s victim and disabled former classmate Isaiah Meyer-Crothers’ mother or Google – discovering that Miller’s bullying and racist remarks were not limited to one incident, and were part of a pattern that stretched on for years, Neely claimed that he and his hockey ops staff were unaware of that."
That to me is the most bizarre thing in the whole story.