He sucks Zombie Man. Coach green should be benching his overpaid ass. Eriksson has to be the most frustrating player to watch. Offense dies on his stick - he cant accept passes, his own passing is off, he fans on shots. I mean his defensive play is ok, but not great and hes pretty slow.PPG through 3 games!
Now 3 points in 7 games.
It would be a miracle if he can hit 40 points. They should sever ties at the end of the season. Useless plugBefore his contract year in Boston he was a 45-50 point player the three years before. If he can get to the 40-45 points with good two-way play I can live with that. Not worth the contract but that is on Bennining, not Eriksson.
Gudbranson is worse.
Eriksson doesn’t suck nearly as much as the Chicken Little’s on here would like you to believe.
Is Eriksson worth his contract? Absolutely not. Is he completely atrocious? Nope.....not even close.
Eriksson can still move around the ice fairly well and plays a very good 200 foot game. He’s among the best defensive players in the league.
But having said all that - we are NOT getting our money’s worth with Eriksson. I believe a big reason for this is that the coaching staff is not deploying him in the correct manner. Eriksson should be playing with Horvat. Eriksson NEEDS to play with a center that can drive play and has semi decent hands.
Henrik was too old and slow when Eriksson got here. While Brandon Sutter is a great defensive center (who finally got deployed in the correct manner last season), he can’t pass if his life depended on him. If you’re expecting offense out of Eriksson by playing him with Sutter, you’re going to be disappointed.
Put Eriksson with Horvat and you’ll see Eriksson pop around 20 goals if he stays healthy.
I also don’t encourage Eriksson to play with Pettersson as his center. Why? Because - I’m not sold on Pettersson being a Center at the NHL level. The guy flat out killed it as a WINGER in Sweden.....not as a center. I really hope the Canucks coaching staff don’t try and fit a square peg into a round hole once again. We’ve seen them make this mistake with Kassian, Tryamkin, Sutter, Gagner, and Eriksson.
I agree that he'll never live up to his contract, but I think he can come close if he's used correctly.
Benning has made the right moves.
It's the ******ed coaching that have constantly dicked the dog.
"Kassian needs to be like Lucic."
"Tryamkin needs to be like Chara."
"Sutter can be a good playmaking 2nd line center for us" (although I do concede Sutter was being used in this role since Horvat needed some more time to develop)
"Gudbranson can carry a 2nd pairing defense and can be used to carry guys that are new."
"Eriksson can be a RW shut down guy."
"Gagner can be a RW shut down guy."
It's just ******ed. Use these guys correctly FFS. That's one reason why WD was punted. Green finally saw the green light with Sutter.......and even with Gudbranson when he paired him with Edler, but he's got to do a better job with Eriksson.
And for the record,
"Pettersson is going to be our next #1 center."
NO! He's not. Another mistake! Pettersson is going to be a damned good winger for us. Our search for our future #1 C is not over. I love Horvat, but he ain't it.
Eriksson should be play with Horvat, and Boeser and Pettersson should be used to play with either Gagner or Gaudette.
Which would be greatPaterson and likely other media have been calling for Louie to be sat. Rest assured, if it does happen they will be going on for hours about a disgruntled Erikssson and if he will be requesting a trade.
Is this the clear favorite for worst contract in the league? Especially considering there are 3 more years, after this one, on it? What an absolute waste.
I'm reposting here what I mentioned in the GDT: a postgame caller to 650, from Sweden, said a report on a Swedish website had Eriksson saying his family still wasn't really settled in Vancouver, and that he was planning on finishing his career in Sweden. The caller was answering a question from one of the hosts -- didn't seem to have an agenda at all.
I make no claim about the reliability of the report, but I wonder whether there might be a mutual agreement to terminate the contract. Has he not received most of his bonuses by now? I've read that somewhere in support of an argument that he would be tradeable.
The scary thing is, this transaction wasn't the worst. At least Eriksson was obtained 'for free' (free agency). We gave up a recently drafted 1st round pick AND a high 2nd round pick for a #6/#7 D.Mutual termination of his contract would be amazing. What a terrible terrible contract by a terrible Gm.
After his $4 million signing bonus is paid out in July 2019, Eriksson will earn $9M over the final 3 years of his contract. Ie, $27M of the $36M owed to him will have been disbursed.