This starts from the assumption that the org is always right in its evaluation and handling of player and are holding him back for reasons other than that evaluation. You're creating a strawman.
It's pretty simple, people disagree with the orgs valuation of some players, and how to best handle them. maybe in Logan's case they are right, maybe they are wrong. No tin foil needed, no contrived theory for what benefit there is for the org to hold him back either, because presumably those who think the org is holding him back also think its an error in judgement not some plan to reap unkown rewards.
Sure, except no one in here has any idea how you bring along young NHL players, no one here has any idea what is going on in the room, off the ice, or even on the ice at practices.
You guys always crack me up, it’s always ‘my rights!’ And endlessly arguing as though your positions carry any weight, let alone match a pro doing their job, party to all relevant information. Pros can make mistakes, I agree with that for sure, but that fact doesn’t open the door to legitimizing armchair GM’s opinions.
The strawman is of your creation. No one is arguing that the org is always right, only you are arguing that, but just because the org isn’t always right, doesn’t make you right in the slightest.
Opinions are great, but no one should be vehemently taking themselves seriously, and getting upset at the org. The only truth that any of us know, is that we have no idea what’s been going on.
I’ll look at how many times this board has exploded over a prospect let go over the years, and how often those players amount to next to nothing at the NHL level in the end, and use that as an indication of how much faith to put into an opinions. Conveniently those fans simply change the channel and move to freaking out about the next prospect that is ‘being treated unfairly’.