joshjull
Registered User
Uhh no. Actually I pointed it out when they had Scott doing it too last game. I'm well aware of what its called its still a glorified 3rd defenseman. Not the proper way to use Omark.
No its not a glorified dman and again its not a specific use of Omark. You also don't seem to understand that Omark's lack of speed relative to his linemates (like Scott on his line) is why he was frequently the 3rd man high. He isn't specifically being assigned to that. Should one of his line mates stop skating so he can get in the zone ahead them? And his lack of foot speed and weakness on the puck would make him a poor choice for one of forechecking forwards in the zone. So there is that as well. If you can't understand that Omark wasn't being singled out to play that 3rd man high and his short comings as a player were why he was there. Then there is little hope getting through to you.
Leino has played what 25+ games on the top 2 lines? Omark has played 3. Two of which he was playing as a glorified 3rd defensemen. How can anyone draw any conclusions from 3 games given those circumstances?
Your argument now is Leino has sucked for 25+games on the top 2 lines so lets let Omark do the same? Why? Why on earth do we need to invest time and energy trying to find the perfect combo to somehow make Omark matter in the NHL? He's too small, too weak on the puck and too slow to be an effective NHLer. He was pretty much along for the ride when he played with Stafford and Ennis. He contributed next to nothing to that line.
The thing I find most comical about Omark is a team that in theory should be perfectly suited for him, according to those constantly complaining he isn't being given a chance, is one with a ton of offensive talent and finishers. You know like the Oilers. Yet they didn't want him either. Nor did any other team in the NHL when he was waived again by us. Yet somehow its the Sabres, Nolan, Sacco, etc fault that he can't hack it in the NHL.
Last edited: