Rangerfan4life90
Registered User
I just worry about our window closing. 3 out of 4 years we've made at least the ECF finals, and made the cup finals last year.
Maybe we won't rebuild. Maybe it'll be a gradual process and we'll never be bad again like Detroit.
The Dark Ages are over. It's going to be a very long time before the Rangers go back to being completely irrelevant for a long stretch.
Maybe we won't rebuild. Maybe it'll be a gradual process and we'll never be bad again like Detroit.
The Dark Ages are over. It's going to be a very long time before the Rangers go back to being completely irrelevant for a long stretch.
This team doesn't need a rebuild - it needs some tweaks.
There are too many young pieces in place to need a rebuild.
I think one of the defensemen likely get moved, I think Talbot gets moved and I wouldn't be surprised if Miller gets moved (unfortunately). Sather will likely pull of a pretty surprising move when he does.
I'll almost guarantee that there are internal discussions about moving Nash, but he stays - for a variety of reasons.
The real challenge isn't next season, it's probably about a year or two down the road when trading the picks is felt a little more. That aspect, when coupled with a wait and see approach to team performance, means a re-tooling is probably more likely for 2017/2018.
But right now the Rangers are still in their window and the focus is going to be on finding the right combination.
I don't understand the comment that they didn't need to draft well.
You always need to draft well, even if it's only to gain resources to trade. You can't draft that poorly over a 12 year period of time. That's not sustainable even if you're coming off several monster drafts.
It's also worth pointing out that Amonte, Kovalev, Savard were actually traded for players within their age range. Amonte for Matteau, Kovalev for Nedved, Savard for the pick that would become Lundmark.
But a lot of what you're speaking to is exactly what one of my points was - this team kept trying to plug in too many holes rather than rebuilding.
There were a lot of poor decisions that followed the cup victory. Trying to fit talent into a budget was never one of them. Trying to find the right talent, well, that's another story.
St Louis had the record at one time for one of the longest stretches of making the playoffs in North American Sports....they are the only team from 6 teams in the original 1967 expansion that still hasn't won a cup
the oakland seals became the cleveland barons and folded after merging with the North Stars
pittsburgh has won 3 cups
philly has won 2
The North Stars became the Dallas stars and won once in 99
the kings have have won 2 cups recently
st louis still none
St. Louis has Tarasenko. nuff said.
I guess I'll go in order on my disagreements and start by saying that Leetch was an awesome offensive defenseman who became a true game changing defenseman as part of a team with Messier. He became a guy who was more dedicated to his conditioning and overall game. He became the Brian Leetch that won two Norris Trophies, a Conn Smythe and one of the best defenseman of his generation.
You don't get what I complaining about? We got shut out, twice, by Ben Bishop. We've struggled against teams in the playoffs far more than more than just this year. Forget about blowing them away with four or five, some nights it wasn't a given that the second or third goal would come.
The point with 1992 is that they didn't have the mindset to overcome a 100 foot goal. It's not like it was a fluke in the second overtime of game 7. They were done after that. So unless that goal counted for 7 or 8 points, clearly it was the response, or lack thereof that was a key component to how that series went.
As for my solution, I think I've talked about that several times and in several threads. In a nutshell, I think they need some personalities that tend to light fires, I think they need guys who are going to scrape and scrap for points in the post season. I think they need to consistently set their tone and I don't think the solution is in adding a star. I think they will need to take MSL's salary and use it to resign some of the guys they have, and I think at least one core player is going to be moved out to both free up cap space and inject some new elements into the team.
I think they could use a veteran, or two, in their prime, who has won a cup - not a 40 year old. And no, it doesn't have to be a star. I think that's a very tangible objective and not cliché at all.
Health is a part of the game. The Rangers didn't lose tonight because their defense wasn't healthy. They lost tonight because they once again failed to put up any points. Now if Nash, Stepan, Kreider or Brassard was hurt, I could possibly understand that argument, but that wasn't the case. This isn't a team that was outgunned by a superior team, this was a team that didn't perform. Frankly, this was a team that came out on its heels and stayed there for the majority of the game.
The hurt has not subsided since last night.
The hurt has not subsided since last night.
I would've much rather seen them lose 7-1.
Instead, they lost without offense and on an awful goal. UGH.
I honestly don't mind the way they lost, they were clearly 100% totally outplayed. It's not nearly as painful as losing in OT in a very tight game. That's why I'm not upset or angry, TB deserved that win, they clearly came to play game 7 where we didn't. They were the better team last night and earned that victory. There were plenty of games in the playoffs where the better team didn't win, but this wasn't one of them. I'm not hurt or angry, I'm disappointed, because I know we could've won that game, we could've played so much better.
This team doesn't need a rebuild - it needs some tweaks.
There are too many young pieces in place to need a rebuild.
I think one of the defensemen likely get moved, I think Talbot gets moved and I wouldn't be surprised if Miller gets moved (unfortunately). Sather will likely pull of a pretty surprising move when he does.
I'll almost guarantee that there are internal discussions about moving Nash, but he stays - for a variety of reasons.
The real challenge isn't next season, it's probably about a year or two down the road when trading the picks is felt a little more. That aspect, when coupled with a wait and see approach to team performance, means a re-tooling is probably more likely for 2017/2018.
But right now the Rangers are still in their window and the focus is going to be on finding the right combination.