Right, cus Crosby benefits a lot from Malkin even though they only play on the PP together..... If anything OV has benefited more from having an all star centre his whole career while Crosby has always had pretty underwhelming linemates from the likes of: Colby Armstrong, to Chris Kunitz, and now Jake Guentzel.
"all-star players", not necessairly meaning on those made up gimmicky AS squads.
put it this way, both are legit top 20 centres in the game. Backstrom was top 10 in his prime even.... Its like youre trying to convince us that theyre not that good. Kuzy was the real winner of the Conn Smythe too and you know it.
I agree with thisAs much as I would like to vote for OV here I just can't. I do however probably have these two closer to each other than most.
sure, but Backstrom/Kuzy is a top 1-2 punch in the league as well.Even though teams tend to put a lot of focus on Crosby's line, it does help both Geno and Sid that the opposing team needs to treat them both (and by extension their lines) as upper tier first line centers. With the Caps the majority of time it's been OV and his line that gets the bulk of the attention.
12G/32P vs 15G/27P.... thats 5 pts difference over 24 games.That's a fat ass lie. Kuzy would have been a fine choice but so was OV. I've watched every single Caps game from those playoffs and you could go with either one. Implying Kuzy got in any way robbed is just twisting the past.
12G/32P vs 15G/27P.... thats 5 pts difference over 24 games.
both had 2 GWG, Kuzy with the biggest one of them all
.... he won it based on reputation as much as Crosby did for his 2nd one. Say what you want. Its what many esperts were saying the next day, but didnt care so much cus its Alex Ovechkin and we all love him.
imagine if Alex had 32P, Kuzy had 27P and they awarded it to Kuzy. The world wouldve been pissed.Nope, it's been discussed in length and even during the game and instant aftermath. OV won fair and square. At best his reputation might have tilted a close call in his favor.
But I don't really care to debate this further.
They were neck-and-neck in points until that blowout win in game 4 against VGK. Ovechkin was inspiring the team emotionally and physically all over the ice. Kuznetsov may have been slightly better on the ice but if you factor in other things, it could have gone either way.12G/32P vs 15G/27P.... thats 5 pts difference over 24 games.
both had 2 GWG, Kuzy with the biggest one of them all
.... he won it based on reputation as much as Crosby did for his 2nd one.
It's funny how if over a 3 year period (13-15) OV wins a hart and comes 2nd for another year, he's not even in the "best player discussion". But if over a 3 year period (17-19) Crosby has 2 distant hart runner ups either side of a 17th place finish, he's in the "best player discussion". Lol, pretty ridiculous.
Caps fan saying Crosby.
Ovechkin had the more impressive peak from 2007-2010 but outside of that Crosby has been the better player.
Also, Canadian saying Crosby. Old news are boring.
Anyway this project kinda lost all credibility before it started.
Not true at all. If Ovechkin doesn't miss ten games in 2010, he wins another Hart and another Rocket.
And, not for nothing, he takes a piece of hardware from Crosby.
The guy is 6th ALL TIME in PPG over 950GP all in a low scoring era while OV is 21st, and you think this is clear. Youre not the sharpest tool in the shed when it comes to hockey are you?Yup Canadians are obviously immun to bias, I am sure the results would be entirely the same on a Russian site.
Also you don't tell me what to do you cucked garbage.
"Perfectly fine debate" where, arguably, the greatest goalscorer of all time with more individual hardware and a higher peak get's trashed by a dime a dozen superstar, laughable.
Ovechkin chose to miss 10 games, by playing a dirty game that got him repeatedly suspended. He didn't miss them due to injury. You can't give him back games for this, there's no "what if" here
Four games for suspension, six games for injury.
That was 2009Did he attend his grandfathers funeral also, or something like that?
They were neck-and-neck in points until that blowout win in game 4 against VGK. Ovechkin was inspiring the team emotionally and physically all over the ice. Kuznetsov may have been slightly better on the ice but if you factor in other things, it could have gone either way.
Also, Ovechkin was in on just about every key goal. 2 goals against Columbus in game 6. Primary assists on the game deciding goals in games 5 and 6 against Pittsburgh while also scoring the winning goal in game 3. GWG in game 7 against Tampa. How is that at all similar to Crosby's first Conn Smythe?
Ovechkin chose to miss 10 games, by playing a dirty game that got him repeatedly suspended. He didn't miss them due to injury. You can't give him back games for this, there's no "what if" here
The guy is 6th ALL TIME in PPG over 950GP all in a low scoring era while OV is 21st, and you think this is clear. Youre not the sharpest tool in the shed when it comes to hockey are you?
Its a stupid comment from an idiot poster. That fact that you think Crosby is ONLY winning this poll because of Canadian bias shows your lack of hockey knowledge, and extremely poor narrative on the subject. I think youre even the first to go in that direction in this thread. What does that tell you?
Go post your garbage elsewhere. Hell, dont even post at all, youre wasting bandwidth..... Youre seriously as worthless and as pathetic as they come on here. Way to go for being THAT GUY to make this debate into something its not. Just pathetic.
Think of it this way: A pollster tries too have a representative sample of the voting populace. If the polling sample has too many Democrats or Republicans, they make an effort to even it out.
This forum has what, 70% Canadians and 1% Russians? (WAG).
Well according to MJ logic, that means OV is more prone to having his family members die. Ergo, OV kills his family.Did he attend his grandfathers funeral also, or something like that?
This is Crosby, would have been more interesting if Jagr had rightly beaten Ovechkin.
my feelings exactlyAs much as I would like to vote for OV here I just can't. I do however probably have these two closer to each other than most.