Legends Tournament: Level A, round 3: Ovechkin Versus Crosby

Who is better all-time?


  • Total voters
    111
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

GlitchMarner

Typical malevolent, devious & vile Maple Leafs fan
Jul 21, 2017
9,959
6,687
Brampton, ON
Level A, round 3:

Ovechkin
Crosby



Round 2:


Crosby
Richard

Ovechkin
Jagr



Round 1:


Crosby
Beliveau

Bobby Hull
Jagr

Ovechkin
Messier

Mikita
Richard


Vote for the player you would rank higher all-time using your own criteria.​
 

TheGuiminator

I’ll be damned King, I’ll be damned
Oct 23, 2018
2,004
1,724
Crosby : better player and career.

If he had played during his peak years, there would be no debate.
 
Last edited:

GlitchMarner

Typical malevolent, devious & vile Maple Leafs fan
Jul 21, 2017
9,959
6,687
Brampton, ON
OvechkinTOp.jpg


c3032b2f062447be87e035458edb881c.jpg
 

Midnight Judges

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 10, 2010
13,629
10,255
Just out of curiosity, how is it Crosby and Ovechkin are paired up, and Kuri and Fedorov are meeting in round 3?

Seems to me Hull or Crosby or Ovechkin would handily beat both those guys.

Somebody else said Bobby Hull lost to Crosby in an earlier round?
 
  • Like
Reactions: JasonRoseEh

amnesiac

Space Oddity
Jul 10, 2010
13,745
7,584
Montreal
Ovechkin is the better player all-time.

More MVPs, way more hardware, superior peak seasons, physical dominator, elite playmaker, higher career value to date, greatest goal scorer of all time.
Crosby 6th all-time in PPG playing all his career in a low scoring era
Ovie 21st all-time.... thats a big gap

depends how much you value hardware, cus you can bet Crosby wouldve had more Harts and scoring titles... and I love Ovie btw
 

Midnight Judges

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 10, 2010
13,629
10,255
Crosby 6th all-time in PPG playing all his career in a low scoring era
Ovie 21st all-time.... thats a big gap

depends how much you value hardware, cus you can bet Crosby wouldve had more Harts and scoring titles... and I love Ovie btw

Ovie is 5th all time in GPG - also playing his entire career in a low scoring era.
Crosby is 37th...an even bigger gap.

Ovie would have had more Harts and scoring titles too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Voight

amnesiac

Space Oddity
Jul 10, 2010
13,745
7,584
Montreal
Ovie is 5th all time in GPG - also playing his entire career in a low scoring era.
Crosby is 37th...an even bigger gap.

Ovie would have had more Harts and scoring titles too.
Im saying Crosby wouldve had more Harts and scoring titles if not for his injuries during his peak. Ovie wouldnt have more, hes never been injured.

Ovie is the greatest goal scorer ever in my book, no doubt, but points > goals whether you think so or not. Crosby is still a pretty damn good goal scorer too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CheckingLineCenter

TheGoldenJet

Registered User
Apr 2, 2008
9,485
4,594
Coquitlam, BC
Different levels.... basically different tiers of players.

If it’s different tiers of players how is Malkin in a tier below Sakic/Yzerman? He is better than both players ever were, and has achieved more already career-wise. At the very least should be in the same “tier” in my opinion.
 

Sam Spade

Registered User
May 4, 2009
27,484
16,207
Maryland
No doubt who has been on the better teams, while obviously being a big part of that.

No doubt who has had the better individual career.

Im saying Crosby wouldve had more Harts and scoring titles if not for his injuries during his peak. Ovie wouldnt have more, hes never been injured.

Not true at all. If Ovechkin doesn't miss ten games in 2010, he wins another Hart and another Rocket.

And, not for nothing, he takes a piece of hardware from Crosby.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KoozNetsOff 92

KoozNetsOff 92

Hala Madrid
Apr 6, 2016
8,567
8,229
No doubt who has been on the better teams, while obviously being a big part of that.

No doubt who has had the better individual career.



Not true at all. If Ovechkin doesn't miss ten games in 2010, he wins another Hart and another Rocket.

And, not for nothing, he takes a piece of hardware from Crosby.

In 09/10 if OV even played 1-2 more games he would have won the Hart, Rocket and Ross. Also in 08/09 he would have won the ross but for a couple of missed games. Isn't it weird how these are never brought up for OV (even though he led in PPG for 70+ games) but people love to give Crosby fantasy awards for 30 game "seasons"?
 

Midnight Judges

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 10, 2010
13,629
10,255
Im saying Crosby wouldve had more Harts and scoring titles if not for his injuries during his peak. Ovie wouldnt have more, hes never been injured.

He certainly has, it's just that he plays through it. In 2010 it was the knee, in other seasons it's been the wrist. Pretty much any time he didn't hit 50 ish goals it was due to injury.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Voight

amnesiac

Space Oddity
Jul 10, 2010
13,745
7,584
Montreal
In
09/10 if OV even played 1-2 more games he would have won the Hart, Rocket and Ross. Also in 08/09 he would have won the ross but for a couple of missed games. Isn't it weird how these are never brought up for OV (even though he led in PPG for 70+ games) but people love to give Crosby fantasy awards for 30 game "seasons"?
we can pick and choose how many Harts and Art Rosses each MAY have gotten, and in the end theyd both be fairly close.

Bottom line is their career PPG (both in low scoring eras) is quite heavily in Crosby's favour, as he would surely be 5th all-time as of now which includes Bossy ahead of him with only 752 GP. Thats one HELL of a statistic, being realistically only behind the likes of Wayne, Mario, and Orr.... And its not as if OV played A TON more than Sid (141 GP, less than 2 full seasons).

OV may have had more "hardware seasons" but we're talking about careers here, let alone Crosby's better playoff PPG and success. THat all said OV is still top 10 all-time in my book, just not ahead of Crosby.

And I have no bias here. Not a Pens nor Caps fan whatsoever.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Sour Shoes

daver

Registered User
Apr 4, 2003
25,967
5,835
Visit site
Ovechkin, extremely close tho.

Take into fact Crosby had a similar player behind him in Malkin to take pressure off of him.

Except Crosby played his best when Malkin was injured or under performed. No reason whatsoever to think Crosby isn;t the same player if Malkin isn't there.

Aside from being the better player offensively and overall, Crosby is much more proven in his ability to carry a line of any caliber linemates than OV is which has been a huge benefit for the Pens.
 

daver

Registered User
Apr 4, 2003
25,967
5,835
Visit site
This is Crosby, would have been more interesting if Jagr had rightly beaten Ovechkin.

I think OV and Jagr are closer than Crosby vs. either of them. Crosby's per game impact is up there with Howe's; he is the closest comparable offensively based on his career to date.
 

Voight

#winning
Feb 8, 2012
40,705
17,088
Mulberry Street
Its Ovechkin but the majority of HFB has a love affair with 87.
Im saying Crosby wouldve had more Harts and scoring titles if not for his injuries during his peak. Ovie wouldnt have more, hes never been injured.

Ovie is the greatest goal scorer ever in my book, no doubt, but points > goals whether you think so or not. Crosby is still a pretty damn good goal scorer too.

No doubt who has been on the better teams, while obviously being a big part of that.

No doubt who has had the better individual career.

Not true at all. If Ovechkin doesn't miss ten games in 2010, he wins another Hart and another Rocket.

And, not for nothing, he takes a piece of hardware from Crosby.

2008-2009 - also wins the Art Ross if he plays 2 or 3 more games.
 

bobholly39

Registered User
Mar 10, 2013
22,316
14,997
Its Ovechkin but the majority of HFB has a love affair with 87.




2008-2009 - also wins the Art Ross if he plays 2 or 3 more games.

In 09/10 if OV even played 1-2 more games he would have won the Hart, Rocket and Ross. Also in 08/09 he would have won the ross but for a couple of missed games. Isn't it weird how these are never brought up for OV (even though he led in PPG for 70+ games) but people love to give Crosby fantasy awards for 30 game "seasons"?

Looking at 2010 or 2009 from Ovechkin is not the same thing as looking at seasons where Crosby missed a lot of time.
Ovechkin already gets full credit for 2010 and 2009 because he played a full (relatively speaking) season.

It's like 2015 for Crosby. He had higher ppg than Benn but didn't win the Ross. No one calls that (or should at least) a supposed Ross win for Crosby. He already gets credit for that full (relatively speaking) season.

2008. Crosby missed 30 games. This is a year after he scored 120 points. His ppg is very close to Ovechkin. If he plays full season - maybe he wins the Ross. Let's say 30% chance.

2011. Crosby missed half the year. Clearly he was at his best here - and no one else really had a great season. This seems obvious that if he plays to end, he wins the ross, hart, lindsay. Maybe even Rocket.

2012. Only 22 games. Not going to pace it out to 82 games and make conclusions - but, this was right in the window of years when he was playing his best hockey. So there's a good chance that if he plays the full year, he could have done better than Malkin (for whom it was probably a career year). Let's not be stupid and say it happens at 90% certainty, but since Crosby was simply better at this point in-time, let's conservatively say there's a 50% chance he beats out Malkin for some awards (Ross, Lindsay, Hart....take your pick).

2013. He had this season in the bag, would have swept all the awards but bad luck that caused him to miss out the last 25% of season (or 12 games). This is closer to 2011 imo - seems almost obvious he would have swept the ross/hart/lindsay if he didnt get that injury.

Those are 4 seasons where injuries significantly impacted Crosby. This isn't fantasy land - this is just looking at the qualify of play/player he was, and what he realistically might have won without those big injuries.

To be clear - none of the above "hypothetical wins" are counted when comparing their careers to date. Crosby is still ahead by virtue of his more consistent prime (prime isn't award counting, as much as it is looking at overall games played in prime and consistency throughout, where Crosby easily beats Ovi) and of his superior playoff resume.

If Crosby hadn't suffered major injuries in the 4 seasons mentioned above - his resume would likely be even more impressive, ridiculously so.

Crosby > Ov all-time is a very clear, if not a huge gap.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad