Its Ovechkin but the majority of HFB has a love affair with 87.
2008-2009 - also wins the Art Ross if he plays 2 or 3 more games.
In 09/10 if OV even played 1-2 more games he would have won the Hart, Rocket and Ross. Also in 08/09 he would have won the ross but for a couple of missed games. Isn't it weird how these are never brought up for OV (even though he led in PPG for 70+ games) but people love to give Crosby fantasy awards for 30 game "seasons"?
Looking at 2010 or 2009 from Ovechkin is not the same thing as looking at seasons where Crosby missed a lot of time.
Ovechkin already gets full credit for 2010 and 2009 because he played a full (relatively speaking) season.
It's like 2015 for Crosby. He had higher ppg than Benn but didn't win the Ross. No one calls that (or should at least) a supposed Ross win for Crosby. He already gets credit for that full (relatively speaking) season.
2008. Crosby missed 30 games. This is a year after he scored 120 points. His ppg is very close to Ovechkin. If he plays full season - maybe he wins the Ross. Let's say 30% chance.
2011. Crosby missed half the year. Clearly he was at his best here - and no one else really had a great season. This seems obvious that if he plays to end, he wins the ross, hart, lindsay. Maybe even Rocket.
2012. Only 22 games. Not going to pace it out to 82 games and make conclusions - but, this was right in the window of years when he was playing his best hockey. So there's a good chance that if he plays the full year, he could have done better than Malkin (for whom it was probably a career year). Let's not be stupid and say it happens at 90% certainty, but since Crosby was simply better at this point in-time, let's conservatively say there's a 50% chance he beats out Malkin for some awards (Ross, Lindsay, Hart....take your pick).
2013. He had this season in the bag, would have swept all the awards but bad luck that caused him to miss out the last 25% of season (or 12 games). This is closer to 2011 imo - seems almost obvious he would have swept the ross/hart/lindsay if he didnt get that injury.
Those are 4 seasons where injuries significantly impacted Crosby. This isn't fantasy land - this is just looking at the qualify of play/player he was, and what he
realistically might have won without those big injuries.
To be clear - none of the above "hypothetical wins" are counted when comparing their careers to date. Crosby is
still ahead by virtue of his more consistent prime (prime isn't award counting, as much as it is looking at overall games played in prime and consistency throughout, where Crosby easily beats Ovi) and of his superior playoff resume.
If Crosby hadn't suffered major injuries in the 4 seasons mentioned above - his resume would likely be even more impressive, ridiculously so.
Crosby > Ov all-time is a very clear, if not a huge gap.