That's awful to hear, so Keefe will want major $ to continue coaching up in the big leagues? Shame this organization is it's own worst nightmare with next best to garbage wanting to be paid. How about they try to promote guys, see if it works, then pay them if it does?
I mean, he wont get $5m because hes unproven at the big table. But the way your organization throws money at anyone and everyone, I'd assume he would get a more than fair contract.
They havent really set a precedent of paying people after they are successful. They embrace the idea of paying for potential, which in the long run probably pays off more than not, assuming the talent evaluation is legitimate. They survive because they have deep enough pockets to ride that wave.
Honest opinion of MLSE:
It seems to me they are in a transitional period. When Fletcher went upstairs a number of years ago and Ujiri was brought in, they went with more a stable approach to their teams. Lou to GM the Leafs, Casey to coach the Raps, and Babcock was brought in as a veteran guy to coach the Leafs.
I remember the day Shanahan came to our floor for a speech not long after he was hired, preaching an identity for the product as executives always do. I think we are at a point where they saw what was beginning to work for Raps and what did work with TFC...Casey was fired after being coach of the year and Nick Nurse, with no real NBA coaching experience was brought in and the core players were revamped - Raps win a ring. The Leafs are in the middle of this change too...Lou moved on after he was discontinued in favour of a younger GM, who retooled the team. Babcock wont be renewed and if they miss the playoffs will likely be fired, at which point a coach with little NHL experience will probably get his shot. MLSE has been trending towards younger managerial teams for some time, for each of their franchises. Imo, once this is fully matriculated throughout the org, you might see a little more success, and inevitably the back of Babcock.
EDIT - the current leafs situation reminds me of the argument between Art and Billy Beane in moneyball. The GM constructs a team that is meant to operate a certain way in order to be successful, and the coach doesnt run the team that way because it doesnt make sense to him. Art says to him - "I have to manage this team in a way that I can explain in Job interviews next year". Its not until they start winning that the coach really buys into the teams identity, rather than trying to forge his own. Babcock is much the same way, but you get what you pay for when you bring in these types of personalities. He is very much the - draw blood from a stone, type of guy...