Not one current Maple Leafs player had better underlying numbers under Carlyle. All players who left saw their underlying numbers increase. Take from that what you will.
All I'm saying is the chart is simply an illustration there are no real analysis wrapped around it. If that analysis was wrapped around the last 80 or so games under Wilson I'm not sure the underlying numbers change that much to what happened under Carlyle. For the entire Wilson tenure vs Carlyle tenure sure the numbers are different.
To coin a Lean Six Sigma manufacturing type phrase....the process was either out of control or trending to be out of control prior to Carlyle taking over. The trend clearly was there before the coaching change (hence the coaching change).
Again Carlyle clearly did nothing to change the trend and that in itself means unemployment in pro sports (it is what it is. coaches are more expendable than GMs and players). But if the end of Wilson's tenure and the entirety of Carlyle's tenure are essentially the same for underlying numbers it would suggest other underlying issues independent of coaching. To go back to my analogy, an input was targetted (coaching) and changed and there was no response seen in the process. So perhaps there are other more important inputs that need to be dealt with.
I think most everyone agrees with that.