zeke
The Dube Abides
- Mar 14, 2005
- 66,937
- 36,957
Again, so what?
So any conclusions drawn about the team this year are based on small samples, not just the ones you object to.
Again, so what?
And, we have a lot of quality players, we aren’t a bottom feeder. As constructed, this team is “playoff” on paper, the question we all have is whether it is a legit Cup contender.
So any conclusions drawn about the team this year are based on small samples, not just the ones you object to.
Does anyone disagree that a quality backup has to be sourced very soon or the season is at risk?
MoneyPuck.com has the Leafs‘ odds of making the playoffs at 37.6 percent. The team clearly has its work cut out for them.
Eight of their ten remaining games through the rest of December are against teams that did not make the playoffs. They start January with a run of six-of-eight games at home. After this four-game road trip, they have two more left of note: a Western conference run through San Jose, LA, and Anaheim, and a four-game trip — which seems like it will be critical right now — at the end of March that includes stops in Tampa Bay, Carolina, Ottawa, and Washington.
Lost in all the drama so far is that the Leafs have had a difficult schedule. If you look at Hockey Reference, they rank the Leafs as having the third most difficult strength of schedule in the East so far. At Power Rankings Guru, the Leafs are rated to have the fifth most difficult schedule so far in the league. They also note the Leafs have the third easiest remaining schedule.
At this point, it’s fair to wonder if the Leafs will, in fact, make the playoffs. They are clearly off the pace and have a notable gap they will have to make up. A legitimate run is going to be necessary to turn the tide of the season. But it’s also clear the Leafs are primed with a talented enough roster and a clear path in the remaining schedule to do exactly that.
I think it would be helpful, but panicking, overpaying, and removing from the roster in other areas for a negligible upgrade (based, and I say this as somebody that hates Hutchinson, on an unsustainably bad backup point pace) isn't going to help much, especially with many of the back-to-back games behind us. Goalie rest is important, but my god, it has become way overblown.Does anyone disagree that a quality backup has to be sourced very soon or the season is at risk?
Before the season started I would have said that we're a legit contender, I would have said it loud and proud and with great confidence. I still say we're a legit contender, I just say it more quietly.
Small is a relative term and the sample size for our season so far is several times bigger than the sample size for the team under Keefe. Of course it's too early to draw any conclusions about anything, there are many more games to be played and the future is always hard to predict.
What is it that you think I've objected to?
I think it would be helpful, but panicking, overpaying, and removing from the roster in other areas for a negligible upgrade (based, and I say this as somebody that hates Hutchinson, on an unsustainably bad backup point pace) isn't going to help much, especially with many of the back-to-back games behind us. Goalie rest is important, but my god, it has become way overblown.
I think it would be helpful, but panicking, overpaying, and removing from the roster in other areas for a negligible upgrade (based, and I say this as somebody that hates Hutchinson, on an unsustainably bad backup point pace) isn't going to help much, especially with many of the back-to-back games behind us. Goalie rest is important, but my god, it has become way overblown.
It is not sustainable to only get 1 out of every 14 available points in backup games, even if our backup remained Hutchinson. Getting a backup going forward will not change the record that has already been accumulated, and there doesn't seem to be a substantial upgrade available for a reasonable price.It's not overblown. Crunch the damn numbers. A functional NHL .500 backup is NOT a negligible upgrade to 0-6-1.
What's concerning is that Florida is up by 3 points with 2 games in hand and TB is down 1 point with 4 games in hand. The math really sucks. Leafs will have to go on a run now, not next month, now.
It is not sustainable to only get 1 out of every 14 available points in backup games, even if our backup remained Hutchinson. Getting a backup going forward will not change the record that has already been accumulated, and there doesn't seem to be a substantial upgrade available for a reasonable price.
Rk | Team | W | L | OL | PTS | Current | Remain | Best | Worst | SRS | SOS | Playoffs | Wild Card | Division | Top Seed | Win Conf | Win Cup |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Atlantic Division | |||||||||||||||||
1 | Boston Bruins | 49.2 | 21.5 | 11.3 | 109.7 | 46 | 64 | 129 | 86 | 1.05 | -0.02 | 99.1% | 0.8% | 82.9% | 35.8% | 19.5% | 11.3% |
2 | Tampa Bay Lightning | 44.0 | 29.2 | 8.8 | 96.9 | 31 | 66 | 120 | 67 | 0.67 | 0.12 | 72.9% | 7.6% | 7.1% | 1.2% | 10.2% | 5.1% |
3 | Florida Panthers | 42.9 | 28.3 | 10.8 | 96.6 | 35 | 62 | 115 | 76 | 0.36 | 0.15 | 71.1% | 9.7% | 6.4% | 1.0% | 8.3% | 4.1% |
4 | Buffalo Sabres | 39.6 | 30.5 | 11.9 | 91.1 | 34 | 57 | 110 | 70 | -0.03 | -0.07 | 38.8% | 9.6% | 1.5% | 0.1% | 2.5% | 1.1% |
5 | Toronto Maple Leafs | 39.8 | 32.3 | 9.8 | 89.5 | 32 | 58 | 107 | 66 | -0.01 | 0.09 | 29.2% | 7.5% | 1.2% | 0.2% | 2.2% | 0.8% |
6 | Montreal Canadiens | 38.5 | 31.4 | 12.1 | 89.1 | 32 | 57 | 110 | 69 | -0.14 | 0.02 | 28.0% | 6.8% | 0.9% | 0.1% | 1.0% | 0.5% |
7 | Ottawa Senators | 36.3 | 38.3 | 7.4 | 80.0 | 25 | 55 | 102 | 61 | -0.59 | -0.06 | 3.8% | 0.9% | 0.2% | |||
8 | Detroit Red Wings | 25.7 | 45.8 | 10.5 | 61.8 | 17 | 45 | 84 | 42 | -1.88 | -0.01 | ||||||
Metropolitan Division | |||||||||||||||||
1 | Washington Capitals | 50.6 | 21.3 | 10.1 | 111.2 | 49 | 62 | 130 | 88 | 0.91 | 0.04 | 99.3% | 4.1% | 68.5% | 46.0% | 19.1% | 11.6% |
2 | New York Islanders | 47.7 | 26.4 | 7.9 | 103.3 | 40 | 63 | 124 | 80 | 0.47 | 0.01 | 92.4% | 19.7% | 14.7% | 8.3% | 11.6% | 5.8% |
3 | Pittsburgh Penguins | 45.2 | 27.5 | 9.4 | 99.7 | 38 | 62 | 119 | 76 | 0.76 | 0.02 | 82.4% | 31.6% | 7.6% | 3.3% | 11.4% | 6.2% |
4 | Philadelphia Flyers | 43.6 | 27.5 | 10.9 | 98.1 | 39 | 59 | 120 | 79 | 0.29 | -0.07 | 73.7% | 36.6% | 5.8% | 2.7% | 6.1% | 2.9% |
5 | Carolina Hurricanes | 44.7 | 30.5 | 6.8 | 96.2 | 37 | 59 | 113 | 73 | 0.30 | -0.20 | 64.1% | 34.2% | 2.4% | 0.9% | 5.5% | 2.7% |
6 | New York Rangers | 41.6 | 31.3 | 9.0 | 92.3 | 33 | 59 | 113 | 73 | 0.10 | 0.03 | 41.4% | 28.0% | 0.9% | 0.3% | 2.3% | 1.1% |
7 | Columbus Blue Jackets | 35.4 | 35.9 | 10.7 | 81.5 | 26 | 55 | 107 | 60 | -0.58 | 0.11 | 3.4% | 2.5% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | |
8 | New Jersey Devils | 31.7 | 38.3 | 12.0 | 75.5 | 23 | 52 | 95 | 57 | -1.10 | 0.11 | 0.4% | 0.4% |
Not even sure what you're trying to say. You think outlier stats are only unsustainable in cases where the outlier is positive?The "not sustainable" trope doesn't work the same way for recognized failures as it does for outlying successes.
Disagree. We arent getting 98 points.For the first time maybe ever, I agree with Mess!
dont waste time looking at what the other teams are doing. Focus on what it takes to get to 96-98pts. That's the only thing that matters.
Does anyone disagree that a quality backup has to be sourced very soon or the season is at risk?
yes looks bleak, just got to get wins.... and a backup.... for a chance..season is already at risk...
Does anyone disagree that a quality backup has to be sourced very soon or the season is at risk?
has not proven to be the case.... 0-5-1 , 4.55GAA, .876SVP not trending anywhere near "improved"Hutch could well be that improved backup.