nbwingsfan
Registered User
- Dec 13, 2009
- 21,393
- 15,356
He is not better than Boyle, that is not now, nor has it ever been true.
You're on your own on thinking that for sure. Hes one of the best shutdown C in the league.
He is not better than Boyle, that is not now, nor has it ever been true.
That's what I'm thinking. A 900K cap hit would be good value for Glendening in a depth position with the Leafs upcoming cap crunch. If Detroit made that possible with the 2 extra years of control I'd award them a 2020 2nd (so the Leafs have a top-60 pick in each of the next 2 years) for their troubles and a young player caught behind others (Timashov, Carcone or Holl).only way it works is if the wings eat half his salary. 900k isnt much to them, but it is to the leafs cap
glendenning@900k for a 2nd + Holl?
Moore-Gauthier-Glendenning would be a decent enough 4th line for next year
Right considering that Kapenen's best season is 43 points 5 point less then Mantha's best season. Yet Larkin is the only one that has more value then Kapanen. Yeah don't think so.Nobody else on your team (drafted or in the NHL) has value comparable to Kapanen. Larkin is the only piece that even gets close value wise. Leafs would have to add a bit but yeah.
Kapanen would cost you Larkin.
For Glendening you’re looking at late picks.
Good asset management should have started by recognizing Zaitsev wasn’t worth 4.5 million dollars for 6 years.
Kapanen would cost you Larkin.
Nobody else on your team (drafted or in the NHL) has value comparable to Kapanen. Larkin is the only piece that even gets close value wise. Leafs would have to add a bit but yeah.
Not what the leafs can afford, unless Connor Brown is going in this deal.
Not much. Good speed, solid defensive/PK player, battles hard. Young and on a good contract, with RFA status still when it ends. Can play both wings and up and down the lineup. He'd bring positive value back to Toronto in trade. Some posters are concerned with next years salary cap. That's all.What's wrong with Brown, when he is all the time on these trade proposals?
Yeah that too.
Though a quick glance at his fancy stats is that they look pretty dreadful, which further makes it odd a guy like Dubas would be interested
Not much. Good speed, solid defensive/PK player, battles hard. Young and on a good contract, with RFA status still when it ends. Can play both wings and up and down the lineup. He'd bring positive value back to Toronto in trade. Some posters are concerned with next years salary cap. That's all.
No, he won't. Holland is one of the most professional people in hockey.Dubas is out of his mind if he thinks he can trade with Ken Holland. Kenny will destroy him in a trade.
Zaitsev, Brown and a 2nd for Glendenning and Kronwal?
Zaitsev+??? for Glendenning.
Otherwise...why? That is an expensive 4th line guy.
I'll take Liljegren straight up.
Pretty sure we'd all take a deal so heavily lopsided in our favor....kinda goes without saying.I'll take Liljegren straight up.
babcock should shut his yep and just do what he knows coach and its losing its luster in my books, the leafs don't need that guy so whoever is trying to push that one just give it up already, that player is way past his due date, no need for him on the leafs lineup....Didn't TSN try pushing this same trade last year? I don't buy it.
because our 4th line isn't good enough