perspective can be relevant, irrelevant perspective is irrelevant.
Only thing that is relevant is the opinion on the 2018/2019 Leafs.
If some idiot felt Toskala was an myp at one time, why project that on those here today?
Some even thought Reimer was better than Andersen.
hmm.
evolving-hockey GSAA
1.Vasilevsky 30.25
2.Andersen 23.54
3.Bishop 21.86
4.Lehner 19.40
5.Greiss 17.47
And Andy has needed many many more minutes than those others to accumulate that many GSAA.
Not really. I have absolutely no idea how you could even argue for anyone else than Lehner on that list.
I also have no idea how you can list a backup and then accuse others of being ridiculous.
Actually, made a small mistake. Evolving-hockey.com has two GA columns, and I used the wrong one in my calculationsLets look at xGA/60 instead
Freddie save .35 goals per 60 better than expected.
Vasi save .30 goals per 60 better than expected.
Evolving-hockey.com
Reimer had a legit claim to being the leafs MVP for one season.
Actually, made a small mistake. Evolving-hockey.com has two GA columns, and I used the wrong one in my calculations
I will post the correct one in a bit
and your belief is that these same people are making these same claims today?it wasn't some idiot.
it was a large portion of the media and this board claiming "Leafs would be screwed if it weren't for Toskala!".
What ever happened to Reimer anyways? How do you explain him falling off a cliff like that if you really believed he was as good as you said he was?Reimer had a legit claim to being the leafs MVP for one season.
You still haven't been able to produce one single argument for your case.Well, if you can understand why Lehner is on that list than you should have no issue with Halak on that list.
I guess you don’t watch other teams play.
That’s okay.
I should add Greiss as well.
My apologies for not having Tommy G on the list.
There feel better.
It's not really that weird. Most goalies decline earlier than people think.What ever happened to Reimer anyways? How do you explain him falling off a cliff like that if you really believed he was as good as you said he was?
Isn't GSAA basically that times ice time, and used with league average as a baseline? At least nowadays, I know a few years ago the GSAA-models didn't account for shot quality.Using GA60-xGA60 (the dif column) should be better metric than GSAA
So annoying agreed.as an aside, the title is a refreshing change of pace from people misspelling his last name. I think people should get our players' names right, especially our better ones though
Isn't GSAA basically that times ice time, and used with league average as a baseline? At least nowadays, I know a few years ago the GSAA-models didn't account for shot quality.
Isn't GSAA basically that times ice time, and used with league average as a baseline? At least nowadays, I know a few years ago the GSAA-models didn't account for shot quality.
Any player could go down and the Leafs still have a chance.
Freddy goes and we are done done done.
Kadri is critically needed for his toughness and drawing penalties.I was thinking along those same lines about how important Andy is, how a lot of Leaf fans were losing their minds when we lost Andy, he was noticeably missed but now that Kadri, Gardiner, Dermott are gone, you don't hear anywhere near as many people saying, we are in trouble have to get one of them back.
Which tells me 2 things, Andy is a critical part of our team and Kadri, Jake and Dermott are not. Kadri, Jake and Dermott are all good players but not critical core pieces. When you are not a critical core piece making good money like Kadri and Jake are, on a team that will have a cap crunch next season, that IMO makes you expendable.