"Nobody" is the most likely ? how?
Its already been reported that LA has shown interest and they have called Vancouver.
Friedman: LA Kings is looking at Vancouver for some scoring addition
- Thread starter UrbanImpact
- Start date
"Nobody" is the most likely ? how?
Its already been reported that LA has shown interest and they have called Vancouver.
kilowatt
the vibes are not immaculate
- Jan 1, 2009
- 18,502
- 21,272
Well those aren't actually the facts though. Blake's on record saying LA might look for external help, but Friedman didn't actually say he's been on the phone with Vancouver. I'm sure he's been on the phone with a lot of teams.
Boondock
Registered User
- Feb 6, 2009
- 5,779
- 2,388
Bettman Returnz
Why so serious?
I was just making a point that it makes no sense… if kings want miller/Boeser/garland something worthwhile will need to be offered. I am good with Roy as an add-on but definitely no a main piece.
i dont think la will be trading roy until Clarke makes his way on the team and shows he can handle nhl minutes rhd who are available right now is walker strand spence
Can you just imagine that Kings do not want Miller/Boeser/Garland?
I know it is very difficult for Vancouver fans.
They are madly in love with Kings prospects and cannot help themselves.
Bettman Returnz
Why so serious?
That’s fair if you want to keep your group as-is… we didn’t just make up this rumour that kings have kicked the tires on miller/Boeser/garland… so we were asking what the offer would be. But sounds more like the fans here want to stand pat and hope for the best with prospect/ development.
Let’s see how things play out between now and deadline. Maybe Blake has other plans (you might not completely agree with)…
Deals will be made no doubt but the best piece likely leaving LA would be a 1st rd pick.. it’ll likely be joined by a prospect ranked somewhere in the 8-15 range..
With that said, keep in mind that our 8-15 range prospects would likely be top 5 in all but a handful of prospect pools
Raccoon Jesus
Todd McLellan is an inside agent
It's tough because on one hand, a lot of the proposed trades are absolutely fair value returns, imo...especially the stuff built around Garland or Boeser for Faber/1st/etc.
In my fantasy world TM actually has the awareness that he's f***ing up Byfield's life iwth Brown and AA and we trade for Boeser and puttogether a third line of Boeser-Byfield-Vilardi/Turcotte
But in reality Blake just overpays for Garland sends byfield down and continues to roll some bullshit line that gets caved in.
..and then on the other hand I also really want the Kings to see what holes they have first before patching them. Boeser is a 'now AND later' move for sure, but we have wingers coming through the system, and we need to see which D are going to pan out before we start shipping guys. I'd be furious to lose ESPECIALLY Faber or Spence at this point. I'm high on Grans too but at least he's still untapped, Faber and Spence look like they're going to be absolute monster parts of the future. Especially since Kopitar is starting to fade. Moves need to be made with the future in mind, not this year and next year.
Bettman Returnz
Why so serious?
I mean it’s not the worst situation to be in… having to sift through prospects. But on the other hand surely they won’t all pan out and enter the main roster at the peak time of competing. So removing 1-2 of your prospects for a more “sure thing/ here and now” player like Boeser isn’t a terrible situation either.
Also we are not talking about some aging rental… you can still have a Boeser for years to come.
Also we are not talking about some aging rental… you can still have a Boeser for years to come.
Boeser is a way better playmaker along with his sniping compared to TT
I would rather see what LA has in their pipeline before spending assets to block that pipeline. Garland, Boeser or Miller are not going to make the kings contenders this year, and next year there will be another crop of players available for trade (or maybe even one of these three this summer).
FWIW order of those three I would want is Garland, Miller, Boeser.
FWIW order of those three I would want is Garland, Miller, Boeser.
kanucks25
Chris Tanev #1 Fan
I'd say Toffoli is the more well-rounded player but Boeser has more overall offensive talent.
Nona Di Giuseppe
Registered User
lmao … this guy doesn’t wanna negotiate, you heard him! Close it up, guys. Crazy idea, but just click off.
kilowatt
the vibes are not immaculate
- Jan 1, 2009
- 18,502
- 21,272
He doesn’t want to and therefore no one else is allowed to
Yes, but they will sell high not low on their assets
What's so funny
The Kings peeps already voiced their opinion that they don't want the Canucks forwards, while the Canucks guys insist that we have to take them.
I don't see any negotiations happening here, its just a pissing match
This is going nowhere and saves everyone time and sanity if we acknowledge this fact
deaderhead28
Registered User
- Jul 3, 2010
- 5,363
- 3,881
Maybe you should leave if you don't like his opinion on a hockey message board addressing his hockey team.
Last edited:
Easy trade here is possible, but only for equal value and for needed pieces.
Teams expecting easy trades with LA because Kings have surplus of assets will be disappointed.
Boondock
Registered User
- Feb 6, 2009
- 5,779
- 2,388
Who said I didn't like his opinion? Where did I comment on that?
unicornpig
Registered User
- Dec 8, 2017
- 3,655
- 5,323
Looks at what eichel was traded for and looks at what Vancouver fans are asking for boeser and miller......
Look what Toffolli got, Boeser and Miller will get north of that in return if they are traded.
Ad
Upcoming events
-
-
Game 2 Indiana Pacers @ Boston Celtics - Boston leads series 1-0Wagers: 1Staked: $1,000.00Event closes- Updated:
-
-
-
