When you get rid of one of your best prospect and mist fastest player in Etem to grab Hagelin who want more money and dont sign Beleskey, the others teams should know that the players is not that good. When the team finish with Pat Maroon on the 1st line, the others teams should know that something is realy wrong with Beleskey.
You are free to like or dislike a player, and you're free to think someone will be a good fit or a poor fit for the team.
But you are not free to make up the reasons. The rest of us follow hockey, so we know the parts you're just fabricating.
You seem to be suggesting that the Ducks choose not to sign Beleskey and opted instead to deal off a top prospect to replace him. The Ducks offered him a four year $16 million offer and he said no.
You then go on to say that he Ducks finished with Pat Maroon on their first line. This is apparently, in your mind, a damning indictment of Matt Beleskey and, in fact, you seem to think this suggests that there is "something really wrong with Beleskey."
What the hell are you talking about and how does Pat Maroon being on the first line somehow prove anything at all about Beleskey, let alone that something is wrong with him? You realize Beleskey scored 8 goals in 16 playoff games with a shooting percentage over 17 percent right?