I don't expect Landeskog to age all that well and I don't see them compensating Kadris for years of being underpaid either with Mac freshly breaking the bank once his contract is up in 2.5 years. So that leaves a giant hole at #2 C and a spot as the 3rd best forward open which IMO certainly is core territory. Odds are that the Avs till then won't be able to find anyone else that has a higher chance of filling that spot than Newhook in the draft or in free agency (they will be in cap trouble by then I would assume).
And you again are making my point. Kreider would be at best our 3rd most important winger. Arguably 4th if Bura can get on one of his hotstreaks in the playoffs hopefully. So why would you break the bank for your potentially 4th or 5th most important forward that is a rental to boot?
Why not go for a cheaper option and keep the powder dry for a trade for a core player down the line if the young guns don't cut it or the cap forces you to shake things up?
Also Bruins have nothing to replace Bergy/Krejci once these guys age out if they trade Studnicka.
These guys might go if we are talking getting a core player in return. But Kreider isn't that. Especially considering that he is only a rental. Thats why trading these pieces for him makes no sense to me.
Kreider wouldn't be coming into any team to be a core player. He would be coming into any team to be an important acquisition for teams that have a need for top six wingers towards winning a Stanley Cup this immediate season. The prices at the trade deadline are always ridiculous, and everyone knows that. But thats the market rate, and some teams improve at the deadline, and others don't. Maybe it'll make a difference towards winning the Cup, and maybe it won't.
Besides, as I already said, I don't think it's breaking the bank to give up non-core players. The top of the roster is a lot harder to replace than most think, and the middle/bottom of the roster is a lot easier to replace than most think. If you are taking away two players who will likely be part of the middle of the roster in 3-4 years, thats probably worth helping to improve your chances to win the Cup, if the team needs the help and thinks they can win the Cup. But maybe your team doesn't need the help and/or doesn't think they can win the Cup. If thats so, thats all there is to this discussion. However, these pieces we are discussing are not going to be core players, at least from how I view what a core player is. If you disagree, we can agree to disagree because I've given my view on what is a core player, and it certainly is not what players like Newhook or Studnicka project to be.