It`s an easy no for Jeff Gorton as well - it`s wrong pieces in my opinion in this divisional proposal.
Doing it 1 time does not make him a 30 goal guy. It makes it an outlier. Do it multiple times to prove it wasn't a fluke.
He might if he played 3, almost 4 more minutes per game like Simmonds has since the start of 2016.
I think the misconception here is that Kreider is benefiting from being on the Rangers, but the Rangers have been horrible for him.
I don't think anyone thinks Kreider is a bad player. But there no guarantee that he just instantly becomes better because he moves to the Flyers, when he's going to play with the same level of talent- and more than likely worse - here.
This move just doesn't fit what the Flyers management team is doing - whether we agree or disagree with it - as evidenced by the Schenn trade.
Kreider is a better version of Simmonds.
Kreider is a player who specializes in deflections and board play, on a team that doesn't shoot and doesn't cycle.
He's a 35 goal scorer on the Flyers - or any team with a system.
He doesn't need to become better. He's already much better at everything 5v5.
Are you not familiar with simmonds' game which is pretty much the best parts of his game as well
I wasn't referencing a comparison of the two. You insinuated that because his numbers are better and he plays with a garbage system, he's be better here, but we don't know that to be true. It's entirely possible he regresses here.
What we do know though, is that Simmonds does produce for us, and does it well, so there's really no reason to consider this.
Huh?He might if he played 3, almost 4 more minutes per game like Simmonds has since the start of 2016.
I think the misconception here is that Kreider is benefiting from being on the Rangers, but the Rangers have been horrible for him.
Why only 3 years lets do 4 or better yet 5 years.Last 3 years
p/60
Kreider - 1.93
Simmonds - 1.50
g/60
Kreider - 0.92
Simmonds - 0.75
CF%rel
Kreider - 6.51
Simmonds - 3.70
GF%rel
Kreider - 7.82
Simmonds 0.29
xGF%rel
Kreider - 4.89
Simmonds - 1.05
Tipped goals % (net-front presence)
Kreider - 28%
Simmonds - 20%
This is in "AINEC" territory.
Why only 3 years lets do 4 or better yet 5.
No, it says he is better in NY and their system than Simmonds is in the Flyers system. And we have said before, we know the Flyers have been bad at ES for awhile. Ironically, it happened when our defense turned to shit and our coaches went from Lavi to Berube/Hakstol.He doesn't need to become better. He's already much better at everything 5v5.
So no 5 years comparison? Is that because Simmonds scored 135 while Krieder did not hit 100? Lets compare 5 years.Let's do 12 and compare them in high school!
No, it says he is better in NY and their system than Simmonds is in the Flyers system. And we have said before, we know the Flyers have been bad at ES for awhile. Ironically, it happened when our defense turned to **** and our coaches went from Lavi to Berube/Hakstol.
So no 5 years comparison? Is that because Simmonds scored 135 while Krieder did not hit 100? Lets compare 5 years.
It's pretty clear who is doing cherry picking with lets go back only 3 years and check stats.lol the Rangers are the worst team in the league at even strength
It's cherry picking a sample to favor the older player. Completely pointless.
It's pretty clear who is doing cherry picking with lets go back only 3 years and check stats.
Why is Philly paying a first rounder as well?SImmonds is thebetter play (even if he's older and signed for less time) I take Simmonds over Kreider 11 out of 10 times.I think this proposal would benefit both teams.
Rangers:
Simmonds
2018 1st (St. Louis Pick)
Flyers
Kreider
Rationale:
Rangers trade the injured Kreider and get an immediate scoring winger that brings grit their team is missing. The Flyers get the streaky winger who sometime looks amazing and other teams seems lost and is having a bad season. Flyers also give Rangers St. Louis' 2018 1st rounder since Krieder is younger and signed two more years.
Thoughts?
Because Kreider is better at Shot Quality and Expected Goals or Corsi For percentagWhy is Philly paying a first rounder as well?SImmonds is thebetter play (even if he's older and signed for less time) I take Simmonds over Kreider 11 out of 10 times.
everythng but real points or goals.Fine, you want 5 years, you asked for it
p/60
Kreider - 1.82
Simmonds - 1.56
g/60
Kreider - 0.87
Simmonds - 0.74
CF%rel
Kreider - 3.06
Simmonds - 0.15
GF%rel
Kreider - 6.91
Simmonds - 1.15
xGF%Rel
Kreider - 3.05
Simmonds - 1.95
Wow, Kreider is still much better at god damn everything!
And this includes his rookie year. All aboard the ****ing roflcopter.
everythng but real points or goals.
Last 5 years:
Simmonds is 42nd in points
Kreider is 111 in points
Simmonds is 12th in goals
Kreider is 52nd in goals
The player who plays more, scores more.
Riveting stuff.
1 more minute a game is what Simmonds has played over Kreider at ES and PP.The player who plays more, scores more.
Riveting stuff.
...so maybe Kreider should make a case to his coach to play him more..?
(Though to be fair, AV is right up there with Hakstol when it comes to player selections)
1 more minute a game is what Simmonds has played over Kreider at ES and PP.
....on a worse scoring team.