ole ole
Registered User
- Oct 7, 2017
- 11,937
- 6,021
Goalies are not good enough they need bigger equipment to help stop the puck.Long article, summary?
Goalies are not good enough they need bigger equipment to help stop the puck.Long article, summary?
Not ~50 % of the games they started.Has there been a season where goalies never had bad games? Even top tier goalies have bad games.
Goalies are not good enough they need bigger equipment to help stop the puck.
That looks like lots of room. Look at the Oilers insatgram. Best camera I have seen. It shows JP going in on Helly basically at ice level. I as shocked at how much there was to shoot at with Helly looking so big too
Yes, if those were the "only" games. But those kind of statistics have been going on this entire season, even for "good" goalies. Carey Price has had .821, Bobrovski had .854, Juuse Saros had .792 (and below .853 for four games in a row), Vasilevski had .857, MAF had .826, and so on. And it's not just one game each - almost half their games have been total garbage statistics-wise, being mid-850 or even lower that is not good enough even for AHL.
If they worked in corporate world, they would have been fired a long time ago.
As long as the goalies are safe, I'm all for making their equipment smaller all around. It should be easy to do.Dryden wants smaller goalie equipment. He basically says the game is fast and beautiful but goalies are just huge with purpose built equipment to cover as much net as possible, who’s entire strategy revolves around net coverage instead of reflexes like it did before.
Its not like we have A dead puck era goingCompletely agree either decrease goalies equipment or increase net size. Sometimes when they show POV of shooters there is almost no way to score.
Dryden wants smaller goalie equipment. He basically says the game is fast and beautiful but goalies are just huge with purpose built equipment to cover as much net as possible, who’s entire strategy revolves around net coverage instead of reflexes like it did before.
Yeah, the game has changed "a bit" since Dryden's days. I mean come on, looking at his highlights it looks like a completely different game back then.
Well, to be fair to the goalies, it's basically impossible to save pucks with your reflexes today. The players can just shoot ridiculously fast shots. So if the equipment gets smaller, how about banning those flex sticks and go back to wooden sticks?Dryden wants smaller goalie equipment. He basically says the game is fast and beautiful but goalies are just huge with purpose built equipment to cover as much net as possible, who’s entire strategy revolves around net coverage instead of reflexes like it did before.
Doesn’t change the fact he wore equipment that was huge for his size. Giguere pre lockout was the worst IMO.
Hard agree. It’s important to note that a goalie who gives up 3 goals on 27 shots has an under 900 save percentage. Because that’s how percentages work. Giving up 3 goals is not the most uncommon thing in the world. Like even 3 goals allowed on 30 shots is .900 which is considered low when it’s your aggregate. Save percentage for a game is, in my opinion, a really silly stat. You need a larger sample size because it tells a more complete story about the quality of a goalie. If you get lit up for four or five goals in a game you would have needed to make 45 saves to hit .900 basically as soon as four goals are in the likelihood of a good save percentage are near zero. It doesn’t tell you anything other than oh, they had a bad game.What a stupid argument. Goaltending is a specialized position. This is like saying McDavid had no points and was a -1 and that play is unacceptable even for an minor leaguer. They’re going to have bad games. Sample sizes are what matter for goalies. And even then, it’s more complicated then that.
The garbage can lid glove is ridiculous.