I think this is how it will play out.I am pulling for Vegas here. They could put together a really good package, probably the best one, and take Bobby Ryan. All without really hurting their organization all that badly. They are also the most likeable of the three teams rumoured to be front runners. I could stomach following Karlsson on Vegas. Karlsson going within the division to Tampa would ruin it for me.
Just wait one more year and buy him out.
Lots of scrubs can string together a decent 20 games. The good GMs won't get baited by it. Zack Smith turned a good run of 20-30 games into a 4 year contract. Hammond. There's loads of them prior.He is expensive for what he can n ow do; however he is not a scrub and proved it in the playoff run two seasons ago. Yes he is overpaid by about $3M.
and I'd love to argue to Melnyk that this option is cheaper in the long run than attaching him to Karlsson and taking a lesser package.Buying him out doesn't save the Senators any real money because Ryan has signing bonuses which are buyout proof, and at least for 60 games a season we have to pay a replacement.
Ryan is owed 22.5M, we only save 5.5M of that via buying him out. We also have to pay a replacement player at least 650k to take his spot on our 23 man roster. That means the net savings from buying out Ryan is only about 3.5M. That's not 3.5M a season, that's 3.5M over the lifetime of the contract, so just over 1M per season.
If we were a cap team, we might buy Ryan out because it makes the cap hit more manageable since it's 2/3rds spread out over twice the length, with the signing bonuses paid in their original years, but we're not a cap team. As a salary team, buying out Ryan is pretty much pointless.
I think this is how it will play out.
Even when there were tweets saying that EK to TBay was all but a phone call to the league from being done, I still wasn't a believer.
I've thought all along it would be Vegas. I see one of 2 scenarios proving the winner.
1) As you say, they'll take on Bobby Ryan in order to keep down the cost/not have to include a deal breaker.
2) They don't include Ryan and Vegas simply agrees to include the deal breaker.
I don't see a scenario where this gets done anytime soon because I think the number of teams that can reasonably take him on is dwindling. Perhaps there is only 1 now.
A question I have is, does he report for camp if he's not traded?
FWIW, I say he does. Seems like too much class there to hold out.
If they know Karlsson, Stone and Duchene cant be signed, there's really no point in moving him. He helps us tank the next few years and will help get the team to the cap floor. By the time his contract is done, the team maybe be ready to challenge for a playoff spot again.Ryan Iam sure wants out,but he needs to play his way to a trade that gets him his wish...We shouldnt be giving up anything of value to move him
It's really shocking how no one as stepped up big time to take Karlsson away from us.
A question I have is, does he report for camp if he's not traded?
FWIW, I say he does. Seems like too much class there to hold out.
Yep ,there is going to be pressure on EK as well to help facilitate a sign and trade as wellHolding out in a contract year could be a very bad financial decision for Karlsson.
He could very well resign,all though some things would be needed to be aired out completely ...And both sides need to do this honestly and man up....Could it just be a little possible that he re-signs..... Man, as long as there's no deal done there is a chance! Super quiet these days thankfully, hmmmmm, makes me wonder/hope.
If he resigns wouldn't it have been done long ago? I don't see a scenario where re-signing would take this long even if there were on going negotiations on salary expecially given managements demeanor when it came to offering him a contract.Could it just be a little possible that he re-signs..... Man, as long as there's no deal done there is a chance! Super quiet these days thankfully, hmmmmm, makes me wonder/hope.
If we were actually dumping that 7.5M in good faith, and were going to use that money towards retaining or adding more effective players than Ryan, there's a situation where the best value deal could be one that includes Ryan.
There's value in dumping money/cap.
I'm not suggesting we should turn down a deal that blows away the second best offer because the second best offer includes taking Ryan. But if the two best offers are relatively close, and the lesser one includes the team taking Ryan, that's wouldn't a bad deal at all.
(Now, we're probably not dumping Ryan in good faith. There are rumblings that Melnyk may want to spend as close to or below the cap floor as possible...)
If he resigns wouldn't it have been done long ago? I don't see a scenario where re-signing would take this long even if there were on going negotiations on salary especially given managements demeanor when it comes to offering him a contract especially given managements demeanor when it came to offering him a contract.
Seems to me like the Sens are just waiting for the best possible return before shipping him out
For this too happen ,EM and EK need to have a clear and united understanding on which way the team is headed...EM says budget team and EK likely walks...EM changes his tune and gives into being more flexible moving forward and maybe there would be a chanceIt's possible (though unlikely) that negotiations are still taking place - Bobby Ryan didn't sign his extension until just before training camp if I remember correctly.
If he resigns wouldn't it have been done long ago? I don't see a scenario where re-signing would take this long even if there were on going negotiations on salary especially given managements demeanor when it comes to offering him a contract especially given managements demeanor when it came to offering him a contract.
Seems to me like the Sens are just waiting for the best possible return before shipping him out
Lots of scrubs can string together a decent 20 games. The good GMs won't get baited by it. Zack Smith turned a good run of 20-30 games into a 4 year contract. Hammond. There's loads of them prior.
Look out side those 20 games and look at literally hundreds of games for the Sens where he's failed to be a consistent top 6 producer while being useless everywhere else on the ice. I would take literally any player who can skate well over him. Smith, Burrows and Ryan were literally amongst the worst forwards in the entire NHL last season.
I don't find it shocking at all, actually.
This is the same player that some writers still leave off their Norris top 5 ballot. You have reputable coaches that think a new award should be created for him because this style of defenceman is not a Norris caliber defenceman. He makes awful gaffes especially in front of his net.
I am not saying that they are right but this sentiment is out there. We see it on the main boards too, right? We have all defended Karlsson to the max. I just don't think there are many markets out there that think he is worth not only the prospects, but the contract. I think a lot of GMs have more time for Doughty than Karlsson.
Karlsson is worth more in Ottawa because this city has embraced him, warts and all. He would be foolish to leave. So long as Melinda is digging in her heels, he ain't leaving. But I believe that aspect , the biggest aspect, is coming around to leaving.
Brian Burke said as much. He felt only certain teams would embrace Karlsson's style of play and that DD is seen as more of a "complete" player. As much as many Sens fans disagree the common perception of EK is that he is a below average defender.