Of course I couldn't name one. That was the point of my comment. It's never happened before. Did that mean that we are somehow cursed to never have a star player on this team?
Let me ask you this. How many superstars single handedly turned a franchise around? This team is devoid of talent from the bottom up. Huberdeau was never billed as a Crosby who can do everything himself. He has always been known as a playmaker with great hockey sense. He's not going to score many goal being partnered with the likes of Kopecky and Goc. He's been with Bjugstad for 4 games now? And he's played better and has had more chances with him.
Huberdeau was never supposed to be Stamkos and score 60 goals
Dude, you are hilarious.
Of course I couldn't name one. That was the point of my comment. It's never happened before. Did that mean that we are somehow cursed to never have a star player on this team?
Exactly, LOL. That right there is the fallacy in your argument, dude.
I
never said that we are "
somehow cursed to never have a star player on this team".
Those are your words, man. You're the one
jumping to those conclusions.
You keep attributing that to me like I actually wrote that or argued that position, but that's all coming from you.
And then you go on to say...haha...I don't know where you got this from...you say that I think Huberdeau was supposed to be billed as the next Crosby?
You are making up all these arguments and attributing them to me. That's what makes you the straw man, dude!
"The Straw Man fallacy is committed when a person simply ignores a person's actual position and substitutes a distorted, exaggerated or misrepresented version of that position."
Oh, and by the way...I don't know how many games you've watched this season, but Huberdeau has played more than 4 games with Bjugstad. LOL. He's played more games with Bjugstad than he did Kopecky and Goc. The move to Kopecky and Goc was because he wasn't producing with Bjugstad. And to be honest he still hasn't put the puck in the net in these past 4 games anyway, but he has been playing better.
And if you expect me to go through the history of the NHL and tell you how many time superstars have single handedly turned a franchise around... you're entirely missing my point in the first place and that's just straying it further away from what my point was. It's quite remarkable man.
I never said "Huberdeau is going to take us to the promised land
alone". Where are you getting this stuff from? Can you please show me where I've said any of this stuff? I can't wait to see what you're going to say next...
At this point I don't know why i'm even going to try explain this again because you haven't understood it yet, but I'll try:
I'm worried Huberdeau may not be the offensive allstar we thought he would be when we drafted him because for a season and half he has been unproductive offensively. I'm wondering if any of you are feeling the same way or if you guys still think he will become that offensive stud he was projected to be?