I'm really trying not to feel bitter about MacKinnon's success but when I see how far he's pulled away from the other rookies in scoring I can't help but feel like we were robbed of a superstar. I'm really hoping Huberdeau can provide that type of scoring for us, but I'm beginning to have some serious doubts.
Is Huberdeau going to develop into the offensive superstar we thought he would be when we drafted him, or is the sophomore slump a serious sign of being a bust?
About that sophomore slump phenomenon...
People act like this is a sophomore slump, but this slump arrived in his rookie season. He really only produced for the first half of last year's half season, and then topped it off with three points in his final game.
I thought he was supposed to be explosive enough offensively for more than 1 goal in 26 games.
Mayday!
I totally agree with all of this BTW; just quoted for truth. I wish we had grabbed MacKinnon, though I do like Barkov. It's strange to think, in all likelihood, Barkov and Bjugstad are much more likely to be cornerstones of this franchise than Huberdeau, Gudbranson, and Markstrom.
But we've all seen this before.....remember Luongo, Horton, Weiss, Taticek, Krajicek, Bouwmeester, etc. that were going to allow us to have a "dynasty," with multiple cups in the mid 2000s. We got 0 playoff experiences out of it. For all of our "awesome prospects," it looks like Bjugs and Barkov are absolutely legitimate. Petrovic may or may not become a stud, Guds is meh, Howden is a busttttt (don't care how great a 3rd liner he becomes...1st rounder and he can't even score in the A....awful), Shore could be a decent 2nd/3rd line tweener, Markstrom looks rough....for our "#1" organizational depth, there isn't as much to be excited about as we would all hope.